Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760554›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2019

Exploring the availability and impact of antenatal point-of-care ultrasound services in rural and remote communities: A scoping review.

Mikaela Doig, Janine Dizon, Katherine Guerrero, Nayana Parange

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Experiences and Learnings From Patient Survey.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikaela DoigUniversity of South Australia City East Campus, 108 North Terrace Adelaide South Australia 5001 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-4489
Janine DizonUniversity of South Australia City East Campus, 108 North Terrace Adelaide South Australia 5001 Australia.
Katherine GuerreroUniversity of South Australia City East Campus, 108 North Terrace Adelaide South Australia 5001 Australia.
Nayana ParangeUniversity of South Australia City East Campus, 108 North Terrace Adelaide South Australia 5001 Australia.
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are global disparities in the provision of maternal health care, with women from rural communities and under-resourced countries expecting poorer access to healthcare services. This potentially compounds the existing higher burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity within these populations. In this setting, point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has the potential to improve outcomes while mitigating challenges and barriers associated with the introduction of new medical technology.

objectivesTo explore the availability and impact of PoCUS use for antenatal care (ANC) in under-resourced settings.

methodsMedline, Embase and Scopus were searched with no year limit. Studies were included if the participants were pregnant women undergoing ANC in a rural setting or developing country and if the intervention was PoCUS use or training.

resultsA total of 3863 unique articles were identified, with 17 meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies originated from Africa, Asia, Central America and Australia. All studies reported that POCUS use for ANC produced positive outcomes. PoCUS introduction into routine ANC resulted in higher antenatal attendance and reduced maternal and neonatal mortality rates. It was demonstrated that it was feasible to provide local healthcare workers with limited training to perform quality scanning and reporting in their clinics. Methods and measures of these three primary outcomes varied between studies.

conclusionIntegration of PoCUS into ANC in the settings examined improved outcomes in under-resourced areas. Further research should investigate the availability of PoCUS services at a country level, the clinical impact and economic feasibility.

Indexed as

antenatal caredeveloping countriesobstetric ultrasoundpoint‐of‐care ultrasound (PoCUS)rural communitiesunder‐resourced

Identifiers

PMID34760554
PMCPMC8411672
OpenAlexW2921553890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.