ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2019
The prevalence of lung surface abnormalities in a healthy population as detected by a screening lung ultrasound protocol: Comparison between young and older volunteers.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of B-line count in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- High Prevalence of the Lung Ultrasound Interstitial Syndrome in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Normal HRCT and Lung Function-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Lung Ultrasound Abnormalities in Patients Without Pulmonary Pathology Prior to Surgery.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023Article
- Lung Ultrasound to Assess Pulmonary Congestion in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- A-lines and B-lines in patients with acute heart failure.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2021Article
- Ultrasound lung surface: Basic considerations of ultrasound physics.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
outlineLung ultrasound can detect B-lines in both disease states and normal patients. B-lines are sensitive indicators for interstitial oedema, but research is limited in terms of what is a 'normal' amount in healthy adults. Current belief is that 3 B-lines in laterobasal areas can be normal. We aimed to determine what is normal in healthy patients of different ages. We hypothesised that older patients and patients with the previous history of lung disease or smoking would have more B-lines.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study on a convenience sample of 200 volunteers: 100 aged 18-49 (median age 33.5) and 100 aged 50-91 (median age 70.5). Volunteers were recruited in 2017 from two participating sites. All participants were scanned by a single researcher using a standardised lung protocol. Multivariate regression was conducted to determine independent predictors of B-line presence.
resultsB-lines were found in 12.5% (95%CI: 8.4-17.6) of all volunteers (n = 25/200), with 20% (95%CI: 13.3-28.9) prevalence in the younger group and 5% (95%CI: 1.9-10.7) in the older group (P < 0.0001). A total of 84% (95%CI: 65.3-93.6) had only 1 B-line (n = 21/25). 31.3% (95%CI: 20.0-45.6) of young females had B-lines. Only one volunteer had ≥3 B-lines in one scanned area. Participants with chronic lung disease had more B-lines (P = 0.03). Smokers (n = 13) also had more B-lines (31% vs. 11% of non-smokers). Smoking and younger age were independent predictors of B-line presence multivariate logistic regression models, but only for females.
conclusion≥2 B-lines are uncommon in healthy, ambulatory adults. Further research is needed to investigate the higher prevalence found in young females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.