Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760514›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2018

The potential value of activin B and fibronectin for the triage of pregnancies of unknown location and prediction of first trimester viability.

Maya Al-Memar, Shabnam Bobdiwala, Mayank Madhra, Srdjan Saso, Bavo De Cock, Ben Van Calster, Jeremy K Brown, Faizah Mukri, Cecilia Bottomley, Aris Papageorghiou and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maya Al-MemarTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital Imperial College Du Cane Road London W12 0HS UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3662-3010
Shabnam BobdiwalaTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital Imperial College Du Cane Road London W12 0HS UK.
Mayank MadhraMRC Centre for Reproductive Health Queen's Medical Research Institute The University of Edinburgh 47 Little France Crescent Edinburgh EH16 4SA UK.
Srdjan SasoTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital Imperial College Du Cane Road London W12 0HS UK.
Bavo De CockDepartment of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven Herestraat 49 Box 805 Leuven B-3000 Belgium.
Ben Van CalsterDepartment of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven Herestraat 49 Box 805 Leuven B-3000 Belgium.
Jeremy K BrownMRC Centre for Reproductive Health Queen's Medical Research Institute The University of Edinburgh 47 Little France Crescent Edinburgh EH16 4SA UK.
Faizah MukriGeneral Hospital Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust London SM5 1AA UK.
Cecilia BottomleyChelsea & Westminster Hospital 369 Fulham Road London SW10 9NH UK.
Aris PapageorghiouSt George's Healthcare NHS Trust London SW17 0QT UK.
Dirk TimmermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium.
Andrew W HorneMRC Centre for Reproductive Health Queen's Medical Research Institute The University of Edinburgh 47 Little France Crescent Edinburgh EH16 4SA UK.
Tom BourneTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital Imperial College Du Cane Road London W12 0HS UK.
Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital · GBKU Leuven · BEMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBEpsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002033Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe have assessed the potential predictive ability of the biomarkers activin B and fibronectin (FN1) alone and when added to established markers for triaging patients as being at low or high risk of ectopic pregnancy (EP). We also assessed their use as predictors of viability at 12 weeks gestation.

methodsExploratory secondary analysis of a prospective study including all women classified as a pregnancy of known location (PUL) based on transvaginal ultrasonography between January and December 2007 at the early pregnancy unit of St Georges' Hospital (London). We used multinomial logistic regression to assess the diagnostic potential of the biomarkers to triage PUL at high risk of complications (EP or persistent PUL), and standard binary logistic regression to predict first trimester viability at 12 weeks.

resultsFor discriminating high-risk (n = 16) from low-risk PUL (n = 93), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.60-0.85) for activin B and 0.55 (0.41-0.68) for FN1. Adding activin B to a multinomial logistic regression model incorporating β-hCG ratio and initial progesterone yielded odds ratios of 0.16 (0.05-0.55) for failing vs high-risk PUL and 0.29 (0.07-1.19) for intrauterine vs high-risk PUL and increased the model's AUC from 0.84 to 0.89. At a risk threshold of 5% for high-risk PUL, sensitivity increased from 84% to 87% and specificity from 48% to 64%. For discriminating viable (n = 28) from non-viable (n = 81) pregnancies at 12 weeks, both markers had an AUC of 0.54.

conclusionsOur results suggested that activin B may be a promising marker to improve PUL triage in addition to established markers.

Indexed as

activinectopic pregnancyfibronectinfirst trimester viabilitypregnancy of unknown locationprogesteroneβ‐hCG

Identifiers

PMID34760514
PMCPMC8409880
OpenAlexW2801165072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.