ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2018
Echogenic bowel in the second trimester - Where to from here?
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isolated Feet Edema in Turner Syndrome by Prenatal Ultrasonography - Case Report and Literature Review.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Ethical preparedness in genomic medicine: how NHS clinical scientists navigate ethical issues.Journal of medical ethics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echogenic bowel is a 'soft marker' on prenatal ultrasound, which can be associated with a variety of conditions including chromosomal disorders, intrapartum infections, antepartum events and cystic fibrosis. Identification of this marker should prompt a further search for other soft markers, structural defects and placental abnormalities. We explore three cases of echogenic bowel identified on routine ultrasound scan. The first case highlights the potential for echogenic bowel to be a benign feature. Echogenic bowel was identified at eighteen weeks, which was attributed to intra-amniotic haemorrhage and consequent fetal ingestion of blood products. In contrast, the next two cases highlight the pathological causes of echogenic bowel. In case 2, echogenic bowel was identified at seventeen weeks with associated cystic hygromas. The fetus had positive testing for Turner syndrome, and notably, there was a family history of cystic fibrosis. The third case discusses a case of congenital cytomegalovirus infection, which was diagnosed with amniocentesis and maternal serology testing when echogenic bowel was identified. A review of the literature suggests that the risk of adverse outcomes is increased with the presence of multiple soft markers, associated deformities, poor growth, persistent echogenic bowel in the third trimester and increased echogenic resolution. Despite these factors, it is important to note the poor ultrasonographic sensitivity of less than 50% in neonates with congenital cytomegalovirus infection and the consequent importance of invasive testing. Therefore, we aim to propose an action plan for clinicians who identify echogenic bowel on prenatal scans in order to critically exclude detrimental pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.