ReviewAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2018
Clinical and imaging features of abdominal wall endometriomas.
Review in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Umbilical port-site endometriosis: a case presentation and narrative review of the literature.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for rectus abdominis endometriosis: a 7-year follow-up clinical study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal wall endometrioma (AWE) is a rare condition (incidence 1% following caesarean section) with a significant variation in clinical symptoms, imaging findings and interval between initial procedure and diagnosis. We present two cases with differing clinical presentations. AWE may be difficult to diagnose pre-operatively, with as many as 75% of lesions diagnosed incorrectly prior to surgical excision. Ultrasonography is a useful tool in determining the extent of the endometrioma and can help exclude differential diagnosis such as hernia. Ultrasound appearance of AWE is often variable; however, the most common presentation is of a solid hypoechoic mass lesion with peripheral vascularity. Margins may be irregular and infiltrate the surrounding soft tissues. Lesions may be cystic or multicystic or may have both solid and cystic components. Power Doppler may demonstrate internal vascularity. If ultrasound findings are inconclusive, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered to assist in making the diagnosis. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the lesion may assist in the diagnosis, but seeding of the needle tract has been reported and must be included in the resection margins. Sonoelastography has shown some promise in early studies for improving diagnostic accuracy for AWE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.