Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760497›Full record

ReviewAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2018

Clinical and imaging features of abdominal wall endometriomas.

Kylie Edwards, Shih-Han Tsai, Alka Kothari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kylie EdwardsBundaberg Hospital 271 Bourbong Street Bundaberg Queensland 4670 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-3956
Shih-Han TsaiRedcliffe Hospital Anzac Avenue Redcliffe Queensland 4020 Australia.
Alka KothariThe University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia.
The University of Queensland · AURedcliffe Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal wall endometrioma (AWE) is a rare condition (incidence 1% following caesarean section) with a significant variation in clinical symptoms, imaging findings and interval between initial procedure and diagnosis. We present two cases with differing clinical presentations. AWE may be difficult to diagnose pre-operatively, with as many as 75% of lesions diagnosed incorrectly prior to surgical excision. Ultrasonography is a useful tool in determining the extent of the endometrioma and can help exclude differential diagnosis such as hernia. Ultrasound appearance of AWE is often variable; however, the most common presentation is of a solid hypoechoic mass lesion with peripheral vascularity. Margins may be irregular and infiltrate the surrounding soft tissues. Lesions may be cystic or multicystic or may have both solid and cystic components. Power Doppler may demonstrate internal vascularity. If ultrasound findings are inconclusive, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered to assist in making the diagnosis. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the lesion may assist in the diagnosis, but seeding of the needle tract has been reported and must be included in the resection margins. Sonoelastography has shown some promise in early studies for improving diagnostic accuracy for AWE.

Indexed as

abdominal wallbiopsy‐fine needleelasticity imaging techniquesendometriosisultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34760497
PMCPMC8409820
OpenAlexW2792885117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.