Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760317›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2021

Radiation-induced breast angiosarcoma: report of two patients after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and review of the literature.

Salvatore Cozzi, Masoumeh Najafi, Lilia Bardoscia, Maria Paola Ruggieri, Lucia Giaccherini, Gladys Blandino, Andrea Botti, Patrizia Ciammella, Cinzia Iotti

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore CozziRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-3460
Masoumeh NajafiDepartment of Radiation Oncology Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran, Iran.
Lilia BardosciaRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Maria Paola RuggieriRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Lucia GiaccheriniRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gladys BlandinoRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea BottiMedical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Patrizia CiammellaRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cinzia IottiRadiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiosarcoma may rarely complicate radiotherapy of breast cancer. This so-called radiation-induced angiosarcoma (RIAS) occurs in less than 0.3% of patients that underwent breast conservation surgeries, usually years after completion of radiotherapy. CASE PRESENTATION: we introduce two cases of invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as an alternative protocol to whole breast irradiation (WBI). They received adjuvant partial breast radiotherapy on tumor cavity for a total dose of 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions in 5 days using 3D-external-beam RT. In both cases, RIAS occurred eight years after radiotherapy, in the sub-cicatricial area in one patient and outside the irradiated area in the other one. They both underwent radical surgery and chemotherapy was performed in one patient. DISCUSSION: The underlying mechanism for development of RIAS is not well known, but its incidence seems to be increasing. RIAS after partial breast irradiation is very rare and has been reported in two cases so far. As it may be suggested in case 2, it is still a matter of debate if the risk of radiation-induced sarcoma is radiation-dose dependent. Although mastectomy is considered as a standard treatment, choice of treatment should be made according to the patient's specifications.

conclusionThere are very few studies in the literature that report RIAS after APBI. Present study is the only one reporting two cases after the external 3D technique APBI. Prognosis of RIAS remains poor. Only a careful evaluation in a multidisciplinary context can offer to the patients the best result in terms of local control and survival.

Indexed as

accelerated partial breast irradiationAPBIbreast angiosarcomainduced-radiation angiosarcomalate toxicitiesradiotherapyRIAS

Identifiers

PMID34760317
PMCPMC8575351
OpenAlexW3156606439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.