Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760305›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2021

Effect of contrast medium on treatment modalities planned with different photon beam energies: a planning study.

Manindra Bhushan, Deepak Tripathi, Girigesh Yadav, Lalit Kumar, Abhinav Dewan, Sarthak Tandon, Gourav Kumar, Inderjit Kaur Wahi, Munish Gairola

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manindra BhushanDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Deepak TripathiAmity School of Applied Sciences, Amity University (AUUP), NOIDA, Mumbai, India.
Girigesh YadavDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Lalit KumarDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Abhinav DewanDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sarthak TandonDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Gourav KumarDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Inderjit Kaur WahiDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Munish GairolaDivision of Medical Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · INAmity University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutinely, patient's planning scans are acquired after administration of iodinized contrast media but they will be treated in the absence of that. Similarly, high energy photons have a better penetrating power, while low energy photons will result in tighter dose distribution and negligible neutron contamination. The aim of the study was to investigate a suitable photon beam energy in the presence of intravenous contrast medium. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn indigenously made original-contrast (OC) phantom was mentioned as virtual-contrast (VC) and virtual-without-contrast (VWC) phantom were generated by assigning the Hounsfield Units (HU) to different structures. Intensity-modulated (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated-arc (VMAT) plans were generated as per criteria of the TG-119 protocol.

resultsIt was observed that the maximum dose to the spinal cord was better with 6 mega-voltage (MV) in IMRT. The coverage of Prostate PTV (PR PTV) was similar with all the photon energies and was comparable with TG-119, except for original-contrast (OC) phantom using the VMAT technique. Homogeneity-index (HI) was comparatively better for VMAT plans.

conclusionThe contrast CT images lower the dose to targets. IMRT or VMAT plans, generated on such CT images will be delivered with higher doses than evaluated. However, the overdose remains non-significant.

Indexed as

AAPM TG119contrast-enhanced CTintegral dose

Identifiers

PMID34760305
PMCPMC8575357
OpenAlexW3204861115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.