ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
A Protocol for Preconceptional Screening of Consanguineous Couples Using Whole Exome Sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carrier screening and genetic counseling in high-consanguinity populations: a narrative review.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Carrier screening programs for rare diseases in developed countries and the case of Turkey: A systematic review.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic studies performed in consanguineous couples suggest that the reproductive risk that distinguish them from other couples in the general population is related to autosomal recessive (AR) diseases. This risk is scattered among the thousands of known and potential AR diseases. Thus, for effective preconceptional screening of consanguineous couples it is necessary a test that encompasses the largest number of genes possible. For that reason, we decided to create a protocol based on whole exome sequencing (WES). We sequenced completely the exomes of 39 consanguineous couples at high coverage (∼100×). Applying bioinformatics filters, we could detect genetic variants that were simultaneously present in both members of the couple in all genes listed in the Clinical Genomics Database as causally related to AR diseases. Shared variants were then assessed for pathogenicity. For non-truncating variants (missense and in-frame indels) we considered as pathogenic or likely pathogenic only the variants included as such in the ClinVar database. Shared truncating variants (frameshift, non-sense, and canonical splice variants) were considered likely pathogenic when loss-of-function was a known mechanism of disease. The 39 consanguineous cases included two couples with a coefficient of genetic relationship (CGR) of 0.25, 26 couples with a CGR of 0.125, three couples with a CGR of 0.0625 and eight couples with a CGR of 0.03125. In 21 of the 39 couples (53.8%) we ascertained sharing of heterozygosity for at least one variant considered pathogenic or likely pathogenic for an AR disease. In eight couples we found sharing of heterozygosity for at least two pathogenic variants. Once the specific pathogenic variant was identified, it became possible for the couple to undergo prenatal diagnosis or, if desired, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) involving
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.