ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Pregnancy in Older Women: Analysis of Outcomes in Pregnancies from Donor oocyte
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived using donor oocytes: a retrospective cohort study.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2025Article
- Does Developmental Timing Matter? Comparative Analysis of Day 5 and Day 6 Euploid Blastocyst Transfers in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Endometrial Aging and Reproductive Decline: The Central Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pregnancy Outcomes FollowingIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the number of older women attempting to conceive through donor oocyte-
aimsThis study aims to review the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies achieved by DO-IVF. STUDY SETTING AND
designA retrospective study design conducted at a private health facility with services for assisted reproduction and gynecologic endoscopy.
methodsA retrospective comparative study of all pregnancies achieved using DO-IVF and that using Self oocyte In-vitro fertilization (SO-IVF) treatment over a 3 years' period was performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Comparative analysis of demographic variables, major obstetric, and perinatal complications was done with Chi-square test and Student's
resultsA total of 343 completed IVF treatment cycles was reviewed; there were 238 DO-IVF and 105 SO-IVF cycles, with clinical pregnancy rate of 41.6% and 37.1%, respectively. The DO-IVF group was significantly older than the SO-IVF group (46.1 years vs. 34.1 years,
conclusionKey obstetric outcomes did not differ between DO or SO IVF achieved pregnancy. Even for older women, satisfactory outcomes can be expected for pregnancies achieved by DO-IVF. It is, however, instructive that for multiple pregnancies, obstetricians should institute appropriate surveillance strategies during pregnancy and delivery period and also to develop institutional capacity for quality neonatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.