Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34759552›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

A comparison of preincisional and postincisional ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block.

Emy Ambooken, Joe John Chirayath, P Raghavan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emy AmbookenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amala Institute Of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Joe John ChirayathDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amala Institute Of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
P RaghavanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amala Institute Of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Amala Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTransversus abdominis plane blocks are part of the multimodal analgesia used for lower abdominal surgeries.Our aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of preincisional and postincisional TAP blocks in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomies. MATERIAL AND

methods54 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients aged between 30 and 60 years who underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia in our hospital were chosen for the study. Alternate patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were either given a preincisional or postincisional transversus abdominis plane block bilaterally. Postoperatively, the numeric pain intensity scale was observed, along with nausea, vomiting, and sedation scores.

resultsPain scores were significantly lower (

conclusionPreincisional TAP blocks are more effective than postincisional ones with better analgesia and lesser side effects, for total abdominal hysterectomies.

Indexed as

Multimodal analgesiapostincisional transversus abdominis plane blockpreincisional transversus abdominis plane blocktotal abdominal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID34759552
PMCPMC8562456
OpenAlexW3210937463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.