Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34759503›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

Complementary Feeding Practices and Nutritional Status of Children (6-23 months) in an Urban Resettlement Colony of East Delhi.

Pragti Chhabra, Anita Gupta, Neelima Thakur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring Complementary Feeding Practices and their Determinants among 6-24 month old Children: A Cross Sectional Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pragti ChhabraDepartment of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Anita GuptaDepartment of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Neelima ThakurBreast Feeding Promotion Network of India, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven with optimum breastfeeding, children are at risk of being stunted if they do not receive timely adequate and appropriate complementary feeding.

objectivesThe objective is to determine the prevailing complementary feeding practices, and nutritional status of children aged 6-23 months. MATERIALS AND

methodsMothers of 350 children of age 6--23 months of an urban resettlement colony of East Delhi were interviewed using a pre-tested questionnaire based on the WHO indicators to record their complementary feeding practices. Weight and height was taken to assess the nutritional status.

resultsThe minimum meal frequency was adequate in 60.6%, minimum dietary diversity in 15.1%, and minimum acceptable diet in 9% children. The prevalence of wasting was 43.7%, underweight 43.4%, and stunting 29.1%, as per Z-score. Statistically significant association of wasting with low birth weight, bottle feeding, and consumption of market food was observed (

conclusionsComplementary feeding indicators were unsatisfactory in most children. A high prevalence of wasting and under-nutrition was observed.

Indexed as

Complementary feedingstuntingunderweightwasting

Identifiers

PMID34759503
PMCPMC8575192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.