Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34759463›Full record

ReviewActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2021

The Importance of Use of the On-line Databases as a Source for Systematic Review of Toxoplasmosis Screening During Pregnancy.

Chrysa Voyiatzaki, Christos Orovas, Maria Trapali, Dimitrios I Chaniotis, Anastasios G Kriebardis, Apostolos Beloukas, Nikolaos D Thalassinos, Eirini Orovou, Georgios Iatrakis, Evangelia Antoniou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chrysa VoyiatzakiUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Christos OrovasUniversity of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece.
Maria TrapaliUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios I ChaniotisUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Anastasios G KriebardisUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Apostolos BeloukasUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos D ThalassinosUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Eirini OrovouUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Georgios IatrakisUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Evangelia AntoniouUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
University of West Attica · GRUniversity of Western Macedonia · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii is a common infection in animals and humans worldwide. This infection can occur after ingestion of water or food contaminated with cat oocytes, ingestion of tissue cysts in mammalian and avian meat and congenitally. The prenatal infection can lead to Congenital Toxoplasmosis with miscarriage or stillbirth. After infection, laboratory tests are positive within 2-3 weeks and remain positive throughout life. However, testing for Toxoplasma infection during pregnancy is necessary in some countries, while in others it is not a mandatory "screening" test.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to review systematically the screening of toxoplasmosis in pregnancy in different countries worldwide.

methodsCohorts, retrospective and cross-sectional studies were incorporated in our review, finally including 11 articles from an initial pool of 1532 related papers.

resultsThe seroprevalence of pregnant women varies from countries with low prevalence to regions with high prevalence and screening policies also differ. Most countries worldwide have control policies, while Germany and Mexico that do not have systematic screening for Toxoplasma during the prenatal period.

conclusionOur results show that Congenital Toxoplasmosis is very rare in some countries and it is very difficult to find a balance between potential risk and benefit of a screening program. For this reason, some countries are limited to prenatal counseling to reduce CT. In addition, the reduction of major sources of contamination especially in developing countries is the most important prevention measure.

Indexed as

prenatal infectionprenatal toxoplasmosis screeningToxoplasma gondiitoxoplasmosis antibodiestoxoplasmosis screening worldwide

Identifiers

PMID34759463
PMCPMC8563042
OpenAlexW3203770537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.