Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34759384›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2021

The trRosetta server for fast and accurate protein structure prediction.

Zongyang Du, Hong Su, Wenkai Wang, Lisha Ye, Hong Wei, Zhenling Peng, Ivan Anishchenko, David Baker, Jianyi Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 346 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
346citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

346 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

286 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zongyang Du *School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hong Su *School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Wenkai WangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-8250
Lisha YeSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hong WeiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Zhenling PengResearch Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Ivan AnishchenkoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-2044
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jianyi YangResearch Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, China. yangjy@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2912-7737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trRosetta (transform-restrained Rosetta) server is a web-based platform for fast and accurate protein structure prediction, powered by deep learning and Rosetta. With the input of a protein's amino acid sequence, a deep neural network is first used to predict the inter-residue geometries, including distance and orientations. The predicted geometries are then transformed as restraints to guide the structure prediction on the basis of direct energy minimization, which is implemented under the framework of Rosetta. The trRosetta server distinguishes itself from other similar structure prediction servers in terms of rapid and accurate de novo structure prediction. As an illustration, trRosetta was applied to two Pfam families with unknown structures, for which the predicted de novo models were estimated to have high accuracy. Nevertheless, to take advantage of homology modeling, homologous templates are used as additional inputs to the network automatically. In general, it takes ~1 h to predict the final structure for a typical protein with ~300 amino acids, using a maximum of 10 CPU cores in parallel in our cluster system. To enable large-scale structure modeling, a downloadable package of trRosetta with open-source codes is available as well. A detailed guidance for using the package is also available in this protocol. The server and the package are available at https://yanglab.nankai.edu.cn/trRosetta/ and https://yanglab.nankai.edu.cn/trRosetta/download/ , respectively.

Indexed as

SoftwareAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyInternetMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsThermodynamicsAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.