Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34759374›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2021

An online GPCR structure analysis platform.

Albert J Kooistra, Christian Munk, Alexander S Hauser, David E Gloriam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genetic variants of accessory proteins and G proteins in human genetic disease.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural basis of ΔResearch square · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recovery of the histamine HScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The G protein database, GproteinDb.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
  18. GPCR activation mechanisms across classes and macro/microscales.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albert J Kooistra *Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. albert.kooistra@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-6021
Christian Munk *Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexander S HauserDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1098-6419
David E GloriamDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. david.gloriam@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-7561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an online, interactive platform for comparative analysis of all available G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) structures while correlating to functional data. The comprehensive platform encompasses structure similarity, secondary structure, protein backbone packing and movement, residue-residue contact networks, amino acid properties and prospective design of experimental mutagenesis studies. This lets any researcher tap the potential of sophisticated structural analyses enabling a plethora of basic and applied receptor research studies.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinAmino Acid SequenceInternetProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.