Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021
Epinephrine before defibrillation in patients with shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest: propensity matched analysis.
Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Shock-Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation During Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Circulation · 2023Trial
- Impact of nurse empowerment for early adrenaline administration for in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A pre-post intervention study.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Adding Purpose to Pulse: 2025 Pediatric Life Support Update.Indian pediatrics · 2026Review
- Correspondence: On the "2-minute rule".Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Epinephrine Before Defibrillation in Children With Initially Shockable In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Stress hyperglycemia ratio as a biomarker for early mortality risk stratification in cardiovascular disease: a propensity-matched analysis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Observational
- Association of epinephrine and outcome in cardiac arrest with refractory shockable rhythm: a population-based, propensity-score matched analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Reduced symptoms of anxiety among professional caregivers facing cardiac arrest after simulation based training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Use of Epinephrine in Cardiac Arrest: Advances and Future Challenges.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Management of Paediatric Cardiac Arrest due to Shockable Rhythm-A Simulation-Based Study at Children's Hospitals in a German Federal State.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hospital Variation in Epinephrine Administration Before Defibrillation for Cardiac Arrest Due to Shockable Rhythm.Critical care medicine · 2024Observational
- Association between defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval and short-term outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Article
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- The Latest in Resuscitation Research: Highlights From the 2022 American Heart Association's Resuscitation Science Symposium.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Resuscitation · 2023Article
- Comparison of paediatric basic life support guidelines endorsed by member councils of Resuscitation Council of Asia.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Epinephrine in Cardiac Arrest: Identifying a Potential Limit for Resuscitation.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the use of epinephrine (adrenaline) before defibrillation for treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest due to a ventricular arrhythmia and examine its association with patient survival.
designPropensity matched analysis.
setting2000-18 data from 497 hospitals participating in the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry.
participantsAdults aged 18 and older with an index in-hospital cardiac arrest due to an initial shockable rhythm treated with defibrillation.
interventionsAdministration of epinephrine before first defibrillation.
main outcome measuresSurvival to discharge; favorable neurological survival, defined as survival to discharge with none, mild, or moderate neurological disability measured using cerebral performance category scores; and survival after acute resuscitation (that is, return of spontaneous circulation for >20 minutes). A time dependent, propensity matched analysis was performed to adjust for confounding due to indication and evaluate the independent association of epinephrine before defibrillation with study outcomes.
resultsAmong 34 820 patients with an initial shockable rhythm, 7054 (20.3%) were treated with epinephrine before defibrillation, contrary to current guidelines. In comparison with participants treated with defibrillation first, participants receiving epinephrine first were less likely to have a history of myocardial infarction or heart failure, but more likely to have renal failure, sepsis, respiratory insufficiency, and receive mechanical ventilation before in-hospital cardiac arrest (standardized differences >10% for all). Treatment with epinephrine before defibrillation was strongly associated with delayed defibrillation (median 4 minutes v 0 minutes). In propensity matched analysis (6569 matched pairs), epinephrine before defibrillation was associated with lower odds of survival to discharge (22.4% v 29.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.74; P<0.001), favorable neurological survival (15.8% v 21.6%; 0.68; 0.61 to 0.76; P<0.001) and survival after acute resuscitation (61.7% v 69.5%; 0.73; 0.67 to 0.79; P<0.001). The above findings were consistent in a range of sensitivity analyses, including matching according to defibrillation time.
conclusionsContrary to current guidelines that prioritize immediate defibrillation for in-hospital cardiac arrest due to a shockable rhythm, one in five patients are treated with epinephrine before defibrillation. Use of epinephrine before defibrillation was associated with worse survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.