Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34758996›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Use of inhalational anaesthetic agents in paediatric and adult patients for status asthmaticus, status epilepticus and difficult sedation scenarios: a protocol for a systematic review.

Kevin Gorsky, Sean Cuninghame, Jennifer Chen, Kesikan Jayaraj, Davinia Withington, Conall Francoeur, Marat Slessarev, Angela Jerath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhaled Anesthetics: Beyond the Operating Room.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin GorskyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada kevin.gorsky@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-6516
Sean CuninghameDepartment of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2594-6121
Jennifer ChenDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kesikan JayarajUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Davinia WithingtonDepartment of Anesthesiology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Conall FrancoeurDepartment of Pediatrics, Laval University Faculty of Medicine, Quebec, Canada.
Marat SlessarevDepartment of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Angela JerathDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Western University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMcGill University · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInhaled volatile anaesthetics have a long tradition of use as hypnotic agents in operating rooms and are gaining traction as sedatives in intensive care units (ICUs). However, uptake is impeded by low familiarity with volatiles, unique equipment and education needs. Inhaled anaesthetics are often reserved in ICUs as therapies for refractory and life threatening status asthmaticus, status epilepticus, high and difficult sedation need scenarios given they possess unique pharmacological properties to manage these medical conditions while providing sedation to acutely ill patients. The objective of this systematic review is to collate evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and feasibility of volatile anaesthetics in adult and paediatric ICU patients for these three emergency conditions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review of the primary studies in adult and paediatric ICU patients with status asthmaticus, status epilepticus and high/difficult sedation needs. We will include observational and interventional studies published from 1970 to 2021 in English or French investigating patients who have received a volatile inhalational agent for the above indications. We will evaluate the efficacy, safety, feasibility and implementation barriers for the volatile anaesthetics for each of three specified indications. Included studies will not be limited by necessity of a comparator arm. We will also evaluate clinical characteristics, patient demographics and provider attitudes towards volatile anaesthetic administration in defined critical care scenarios. Data will be extracted and analysed across these domains. The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index as well as the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register will be queried with our search strategy.Descriptive and statistical analysis will be employed where appropriate. Data extraction and quality assessment will be performed in duplicate using a standardised tool. A narrative approach and statistical analyses will be used to describe patient characteristics, volatile efficacy, safety concerns, technical administration, attitudes towards administration and other implementation barriers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics board approval will be necessary for this systematic review. This research is independently funded. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentation. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42021233083.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthetics, InhalationStatus AsthmaticusAdultChildHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsSystematic Reviews as TopicAnesthetics, InhalationHypnotics and Sedativesadult anaesthesiaadult intensive & critical careanaesthesia in neurologyasthma

Identifiers

PMID34758996
PMCPMC8587357
OpenAlexW3213550074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.