Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34758270›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021

The effect of subliminal incentives on goal-directed eye movements.

Vasko Kilian Hinze, Ozge Uslu, Jessica Emily Antono, Melanie Wilke, Arezoo Pooresmaeili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasko Kilian HinzePerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen: A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Göttingen, Germany.
Ozge UsluPerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen: A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Göttingen, Germany.
Jessica Emily AntonoPerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen: A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Göttingen, Germany.
Melanie WilkeDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Arezoo PooresmaeiliPerception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen: A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4369-8838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decades, several studies have demonstrated that conscious and unconscious reward incentives both affect performance in physical and cognitive tasks, suggesting that goal pursuit can arise from an unconscious will. Whether the planning of goal-directed saccadic eye movements during an effortful task can also be affected by subliminal reward cues has not been systematically investigated. We employed a novel task where participants made several eye movements back and forth between a fixation point and a number of peripheral targets. The total number of targets visited by the eyes in a fixed amount of time determined participants' monetary gain. The magnitude of the reward at stake was briefly shown at the beginning of each trial and masked by pattern images superimposed in time so that at shorter display durations participants perceived reward incentives subliminally. We found a main effect of reward across all display durations as higher reward enhanced participants' oculomotor effort measured as the frequency and peak velocity of saccades. This effect was strongest for consciously perceived rewards but also occurred when rewards were subliminally perceived. Although we did not find a statistically significant dissociation between the reward-related modulation of different saccadic parameters, across two experiments the most robust effect of subliminal rewards was observed for the modulation of the saccadic frequency but not the peak velocity. These results suggest that multiple indices of oculomotor effort can be incentivized by subliminal rewards and that saccadic frequency may provide the most sensitive indicator of subliminal incentivization of eye movements.

Indexed as

GoalsRewardAdultConsciousnessEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesSubliminal StimulationYoung Adultconscious awarenessrewardsaccadesubliminal

Identifiers

PMID34758270
PMCPMC8715050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.