Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34758115›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Empowering patients with the PREPARE advance care planning program results in reciprocal clinician communication.

Sarah Nouri, Richard L Street, Deborah E Barnes, Ying Shi, Aiesha M Volow, Brookelle Li, Stewart C Alexander, Rebecca L Sudore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. PEC innovation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah NouriDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7163-0366
Richard L StreetMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Deborah E BarnesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ying ShiDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Aiesha M VolowSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Brookelle LiSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stewart C AlexanderDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Rebecca L SudoreSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Improving advance care planning for seniors at risk for Alzheimers disease and related dementias and their caregiversR01AG045043 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI SUDORE, REBECCA L · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
Mentoring Researchers in Advance Care Planning for Underrepresented Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Their CaregiversK24AG054415 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI REBECCA L SUDORE · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054415NIA NIH HHS K24AG054415NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045043Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CDR-1306-01500VA #11-110-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe patient-directed PREPAREforYourCare.org program empowers patients to participate in advance care planning (ACP) discussions with clinicians. Our goal was to determine whether PREPARE could reciprocally increase clinician ACP communication.

methodsIn a secondary analysis of two trials evaluating the efficacy of PREPARE plus an easy-to-read advance directive (AD) versus an AD alone, patients were included if they were ≥55 years old, English- or Spanish-speaking, and had ≥2 chronic conditions. We audio-recorded postintervention primary care visits and used the validated clinician-patient participation coding scheme to calculate the number of clinician ACP utterances concerning information-giving, recommendations, or supportive talk. We examined differences by study arm using mixed effects negative binomial models, stratifying by language. To assess possible mediation, we adjusted for active patient participation (e.g., asking questions or stating preferences).

resultsThree hundred ninety-three visits were audio-recorded (177 in PREPARE arm and 216 in AD-only arm). Recordings included 179 clinicians (mean 2.2 [SD 1.9] patients each). Patients' mean age was 66 ± 8 years, 31% had limited health literacy, and 25% were Spanish-speaking. Exactly 67% of recordings included information-giving, 85% recommendations, and 62% supportive talk. PREPARE resulted in 51% more clinician supportive talk versus the AD alone (mean 4.5 [8.9] vs. 2.9 [6.0] utterances; incidence rate ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.02-2.24]). Effects were most pronounced among Spanish speakers. There were no differences in information-giving or recommendations. After adjusting for active patient participation, no differences in supportive talk remained.

conclusionsThe patient-directed PREPARE program was associated with greater clinician supportive ACP communication with older adults compared with an AD alone; the effect was most pronounced among Spanish speakers and was mediated by active patient participation. Thus, PREPARE helps patients be more engaged communicators, which in turn encourages clinicians to be more supportive of patients. Enhanced patient-clinician communication represents an important mechanism by which PREPARE may decrease disparities in ACP.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCommunicationHealth LiteracyHealth PersonnelAgedChronic DiseaseEthnicityFemaleHumansLanguageMalePatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadvance care planningdiverse populationsolder adultspatient activationpatient-provider communication

Identifiers

PMID34758115
PMCPMC8821241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.