ReviewEndocrinology2022
Sex and Liver Disease: The Necessity of an Overarching Theory to Explain the Effect of Sex on Nonreproductive Functions.
Review in Endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of early life adversity on acute metabolic outcomes during neonatal development.Neurobiology of stress · 2026Article
- Maternal Exposure to Ozone During Implantation Promotes a Feminized Transcriptomic Profile in the Male Adolescent Liver.Endocrinology · 2025Article
- Acute brain injury and nanomedicine: sex as a biological variable.Frontiers in biomaterials science · 2024Article
- Sex Differences of Cardiolipin in Tissue Distribution Based on Targeted Lipidomic Analysis by UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The number of studies illuminating major sex differences in liver metabolic activities is growing, but we still lack a theory to explain the origin of the functional differences we are identifying. In the animal kingdom, energy metabolism is tightly associated with reproduction; conceivably, the major evolutionary step that occurred about 200 million years ago with placentation determined a significant change in female physiology, as females had to create new energy strategies to allow the growth of the embryo in the womb and the lactation of the newborn. In vertebrates the liver is the metabolic organ most tuned to gonadal functions because the liver synthesizes and transports of all the components necessary for the maturation of the egg upon estrogenic stimulation. Thus, in mammals, evolution must have worked on the already strict gonad-liver relationship fostering these novel reproductive needs. As a consequence, the functions of mammalian liver in females diverged from that in males to acquire the flexibility necessary to tailor metabolism according to reproductive status and to ensure the parsimonious exploitation and storage of energy for the continuation of gestation in case of food scarcity. Indeed, several studies show that male and female livers adopt very different strategies when confronted with nutritional stress of varied origins. Considering the role of liver and energy metabolism in most pathologies, a better focus on liver functions in the 2 sexes might be of considerable help in personalizing medicine and pharmacology for male and female needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.