Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34758056›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic surgery journal2022

Hyaluronic Acid Compound Filling Plus Mesotherapy vs Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Horizontal Neck Lines: A Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Prospective Study in Chinese Subjects.

Yiming Li, Meirong Liao, Yijin Zhu, Jie Gao, Yang Song, Yang Zhai, Miao Zhu, Yan He, Weiwei Dong

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Progress in Neck Rejuvenation Injection Therapy.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yiming LiDepartment of Dermatology and Venerology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Meirong LiaoDepartment of Dermatology, Sichuan FreSkin Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yijin ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, Sichuan FreSkin Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jie GaoDepartment of Dermatology, Sichuan FreSkin Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yang SongDepartment of Dermatology, Xian FreSkin Hospital, Xian, Shanxi, China.
Yang ZhaiDepartment of Dermatology, Xian FreSkin Hospital, Xian, Shanxi, China.
Miao ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, Changsha FreSkin Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yan HeDepartment of Dermatology, Chongqing FreSkin Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Weiwei DongDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sichuan FreSkin Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-7100

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough energy devices and botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) can alleviate age-related laxity, ptosis, and platysmal bands, they have limited efficacy on horizontal neck lines.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction of a combined treatment of non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) compound filling plus mesotherapy for the correction of horizontal neck lines, in comparison with BTX-A.

methodsThis multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, prospective study enrolled female patients with moderate-to-severe horizontal neck lines corrected with either 2 or 3 sessions of of non-cross-linked HA compound filling plus mesotherapy or 1 session of BTX-A injection. Improvement of the neck lines grades, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), patient satisfaction, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated and compared at 1, 3, 6, and 10 months after the final treatment.

resultsTwenty-five patients received HA filling plus mesotherapy and 23 received BTX-A injection. Compared with BTX-A, the HA compound filling plus mesotherapy significantly improved the horizontal neck lines grades on all follow-up visits (P = 0.000). Cases of different baseline grades (2, 2.5, and 3) demonstrated similar outcomes. The GAIS and patients' satisfaction ratings were significantly higher for the HA filling plus mesotherapy treatment group (P = 0.000). Significantly higher pain ratings, higher incidence, and longer recovery of AEs (erythema, edema, and ecchymosis) were noticed in the combined treatment group (P < 0.001). No serious AEs occurred.

conclusionsCompared with BTX-A, combined treatment with HA compound filling plus mesotherapy significantly improved moderate-to-severe horizontal neck lines and achieved a high level of patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ACosmetic TechniquesMesotherapySkin AgingChinaFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type AHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID34758056
PMCPMC8972830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.