Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34757861›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2021

Pharmacokinetic interaction between rhynchopylline and pellodendrine via CYP450 enzymes and

Qingzhen Meng, Yongheng Cheng, Cui Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingzhen MengDepartment of Intravenous Drug Allocation, Weifang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Weifang, China.
Yongheng ChengOutpatient Pharmacy, Weifang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Weifang, China.
Cui ZhouDepartment of Intravenous Drug Allocation, Weifang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Weifang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRhynchopylline and pellodendrine are major extractions of commonly used Chinese medicine in gynaecology. The interaction between these two compounds could affect treatment efficiency and even result in toxicity during their co-administration in gynaecological prescription.

objectiveThe pharmacokinetic interaction between rhynchopylline and pellodendrine and the potential mechanism were investigated in this study. MATERIALS AND

methodsSprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between rhynchopylline (30 mg/kg) and pellodendrine (20 mg/kg) with single dose of these two drugs as the control. The transport of rhynchopylline was evaluated in the Caco-2 cell model. Additionally, the metabolic stability and the activity of corresponding CYP450 enzymes were assessed in rat liver microsomes.

resultsThe pharmacokinetic profile of rhynchopylline was dramatically affected by pellodendrine with the increased area under the pharmacokinetic curve (3080.14 ± 454.54 vs. 1728.08 ± 220.598 μg/L*h), DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe adverse interaction between rhynchopylline and pellodendrine draws attention to the co-administration of these two herbs and provides a reference for further investigations with a broader study population.

Indexed as

AnimalsArea Under CurveATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Caco-2 CellsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug InteractionsHumansMaleMicrosomes, LiverOxindolesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemOxindolesrhyncophyllineherb–herb interactionPhellodendron amurense RuprUncaria rhynchophylla (Miq.) Miq. ex Havil

Identifiers

PMID34757861
PMCPMC8583760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.