ReviewHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2021
SPRINT Revisited: Updated Results and Implications.
Review in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systolic blood pressure targets below 120 mm Hg are associated with reduced mortality: A meta-analysis.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Goals: Evidence for Cardiovascular Protection From Observational Studies and Clinical Trials.American journal of hypertension · 2022Pooled it
- Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Regional Changes in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Biomarkers: Post Hoc Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Evaluation of guideline adherence to hypertension-mediated organ damage screening in Korean patients with hypertension: results from the Korean Registry of Target Organ Damage in Hypertension (KorHR).Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
- The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: 10 Years Later.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Effect of Systolic Blood Pressure Measurement Error on the Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive Blood Pressure Targets.Annals of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Healthy ageing in older adults with cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Obesity Biomarkers: Exploring Factors, Ramification, Machine Learning, and AI-Unveiling Insights in Health Research.MedComm · 2025Review
- Clinical Trials in Hypertension: A Mathematical Endorsement for Diagnosis and Treatment.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Review
- Sex-based comparison of the blood pressure, haemodynamic and cardiac autonomic adaptations following isometric exercise training in sedentary adults: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Incidence and Associated Risk Factors of Hypertension among Apparently Healthy Adult Filipinos in the LIFECARE Philippine Cohort Study.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
- The NITRATE-OCT study-inorganic nitrate reduces in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- The Polypill: A New Alternative in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Standing Blood Pressure and Risk of Falls, Syncope, Coronary Heart Disease, and Mortality.American journal of hypertension · 2023Article
- Editors' Commentary on the 2023 ESH Management of Arterial Hypertension Guidelines.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Article
- Hypertensive Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) results have influenced clinical practice but have also generated discussion regarding the validity, generalizability, and importance of the findings. Following the SPRINT primary results manuscript in 2015, additional results and analyses of the data have addressed these concerns. The primary objective of this article is to respond to key questions that have been raised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.