Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34757671›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2021

Clinical genetic counselor experience in the adoption of telehealth in the United States and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Daria Ma, Priyanka R Ahimaz, James M Mirocha, Lola Cook, Jessica L Giordano, Pooja Mohan, Stephanie A Cohen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Assessing genetic counseling efficiency with natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic deserts: Community-level barriers to appropriate genetics services.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Daria MaCedars Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6719-627X
Priyanka R AhimazDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
James M MirochaCedars-Sinai Research Institute and Clinical & Translational Science Institute (CTSI), Los Angeles, California, USA.
Lola CookDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Jessica L GiordanoDepartment of OBGYN, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Pooja MohanNatera Inc., San Carlos, California, USA.
Stephanie A CohenAscension St. Vincent, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USIndiana University School of MedicineNatera (United States) · USSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute · USSt. Vincent Hospital · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI)Health IT Special Interest Group of NSGCNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR001881NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the service delivery model (SDM) of clinical genetic counseling across the United States and Canada. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to 4,956 genetic counselors (GCs) from the American Board of Genetic Counselors and Canadian Association of Genetic Counselors mailing lists in August 2020 to assess the change in utilization of telehealth for clinical genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with prior to the pandemic. Data from 411 eligible clinical genetic counselors on GC attitudes and their experiences prior to and during the pandemic were collected and analyzed to explore the change in SDM, change in appointment characteristics, change in billing practices, GC perceived benefits and limitations of telehealth, and prediction of future trends in SDM in the post-pandemic era. The study showed the overall utilization of audiovisual and telephone encounters increased by 43.4% and 26.2%, respectively. The majority of respondents who provided audiovisual and telephone encounters reported increased patient volume compared with prior to the pandemic, with an average increase of 79.4% and 42.8%, respectively. There was an increase of 69.4% of GCs rendering genetic services from home offices. The percentage of participants who billed for telehealth services increased from 45.7% before the pandemic to 80.3% during the pandemic. The top GC perceived benefits of telehealth included safety for high-risk COVID patients (95.2%) and saved commute time for patients (94.7%). The top GC perceived limitations of telehealth included difficulty to conduct physician evaluation/coordinating with healthcare providers (HCP) (73.7%) and difficulty addressing non-English speaking patients (68.5%). Overall, 89.6% of GCs were satisfied with telehealth; however, 55.3% reported uncertainty whether the newly adopted SDM would continue after the pandemic subsides. Results from this study demonstrate the rapid adoption of telehealth for clinical genetic counseling services as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in billing for these services, and support the feasibility of telehealth for genetic counseling as a longer term solution to reach patients who are geographically distant.

Indexed as

CounselorsCOVID-19TelemedicineCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19genetic counselingservice delivery modelstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34757671
PMCPMC9528751
OpenAlexW3213788074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.