ArticlePerspectives on medical education2021
Rethinking implementation science for health professions education: A manifesto for change.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- When I say … impact in health professions education research.Medical education · 2026Article
- Organizational readiness for implementation of food and nutrition surveillance in Brazilian primary health care: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Systemic Barriers to Curriculum Adaptation for Rapidly Changing Knowledge in Medical Education: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- ADMSEP Milestones: Why Frameworks Don't Necessarily Translate to Adoption.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- CBME As a Philosophy of Training: Balancing Fidelity and Flexibility in Emergency Medicine.AEM education and training · 2026Review
- How to … Maximise Your Clinical Education Research Impact.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Let's talk about change as the only constant in life and science:Canadian medical education journal · 2026Article
- The reporting outcomes in medical education (ROME) model: proposition of a new framework.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Faculty Development Paradox: Applying Competency-Based Education Principles to Faculty Development.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Understanding implementation research.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- What do clinicians perceive as the effective implementation strategies for TREAT journal clubs? A qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Implementing pain competencies in Canadian physiotherapy education: Challenges, barriers, and opportunities.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2025Article
- The Next Era of Assessment Within Medical Education: Exploring Intersections of Context and Implementation.Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- Proximity to Practice: The Role of Technology in the Next Era of Assessment.Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- The European Respiratory Society led training programme improves self-reported competency and increases the use of thoracic ultrasound.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023Review
- Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2023Article
- Harnessing a knowledge translation framework to implement an undergraduate medical education intervention: A longitudinal study.Perspectives on medical education · 2022Article
- Editorial plan forPublic health action · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implementation science approaches the challenges of translating evidence into practice as a matter of scientific inquiry. This conceptual paper uses an implementation science lens to examine the ways in which evidence from health professions education research is brought to bear on decision-making. The authors describe different decision-making contexts and the kinds of evidence they consider, and from this, they outline ways in which research findings might be better presented to support their translation into policy and practice. Reflecting on the nature of decision-making in health professions education and how decisions are made and then implemented in different health professions education contexts, the authors argue that researchers should align their work with the decision-making contexts that are most likely to make use of them. These recommendations reflect implementation science principles of packaging and disseminating evidence in ways that are meaningful for key stakeholders, that stem from co-creation of knowledge, that require or result in meaningful partnerships, and that are context specific and relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.