Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34757497›Full record

SynthesisJournal of anesthesia2022

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure combined with recruitment maneuver on intraoperative ventilation during abdominal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xiang Li, Zhi-Lin Ni, Jun Wang, Xiu-Cheng Liu, Hui-Lian Guan, Ming-Sheng Dai, Xing Gao, Yang Zhou, Xiao-Yi Hu, Xun Sun and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06123039 (Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06123039 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Universitario La FeRan2023 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsAnesthesia, Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Hypovolemia, Haemodynamic InstabilityArmsTidal Volume Challenge, Recruitment maneuver obtaining individualised PEEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiang Li *Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Zhi-Lin Ni *Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Jun Wang *Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Xiu-Cheng Liu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, XuzhouJiangsu, 221000, China.
Hui-Lian GuanJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Ming-Sheng DaiJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Xing GaoJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Yang ZhouJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao-Yi HuJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Xun SunJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Jian ZhouJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Qiu ZhaoJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Qian-Qian ZhangJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
He LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Yuan HanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China. yuan.han@fdeent.org.
Jun-Li Cao *Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China. junlicao0310@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1868-9603
Xuzhou Medical College · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed by individualized PEEP was a new method to optimize the intraoperative pulmonary function. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the effects of individualized PEEP + RM on intraoperative pulmonary function and hemodynamic with other PEEP and RM settings. The primary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance, while the secondary outcomes were intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In total, we identified 15 clinical trials containing 36 randomized groups with 3634 participants. Ventilation strategies were divided into eight groups by four PEEP (L: low, M: moderate, H: high, and I: individualized) and two RM (yes or no) settings. The main results showed that IPEEP + RM group was superior to all other groups regarding to both oxygenation index and dynamic compliance. LPEEP group was inferior to LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, and IPEEP + RM in terms of oxygenation index and LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, HPEEP + RM, IPEEP, and IPEEP + RM in terms of dynamic compliance. All comparisons were similar for secondary outcomes. Our analysis suggested that individualized PEEP and RM may be the optimal low tidal volume ventilation strategy at present, while low PEEP without RM is not suggested.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary AtelectasisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTidal VolumeAbdominal surgeryAlveolar recruitment maneuverIndividualizedNetwork meta-analysisPositive end-expiratory pressureProtective lung strategy

Identifiers

PMID34757497
PMCPMC8967744
OpenAlexW3214278439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.