SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2022
The child's perception on monitoring inflammatory bowel disease activity.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predictive value of intestinal ultrasound for treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and pooled data analysis.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world data on STRIDE-II treatment targets in a pediatric cohort with inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Frequency and impact of repeat colonoscopy as a treat-to-target approach in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.JPGN reports · 2026Article
- Noninvasive monitoring with bowel ultrasound (NIMBUS) in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Feasibility in a single centre.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- PET/MRI in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease - a prospective accuracy study.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2025Article
- Ultrasound in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Review of the State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Predicting Treatment Response in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Cross-Sectional Imaging Markers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Intestinal Ultrasound to Assess Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity in Children: External Validation and Comparison of 2 Intestinal Ultrasound Activity Indices.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Article
- Serum cytokines MCP-1 and GCS-F as potential biomarkers in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the perception of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) regarding monitoring tests, we first compared the reported discomfort and patient perspective during gastro-intestinal (GI)-endoscopy, magnetic resonance entrography (MRE), and ultrasound (US) and, in a second comparison, patient preference on non-invasive tests (venipuncture, sampling stool and US). A cross-sectional study in children 8-18 years undergoing an US, MRE, and GI-endoscopy for diagnosis or follow-up of IBD. After each procedure, the children filled out the Discomfort during research procedures questionnaire (DISCO-RC). Items of the DISCO-RC are as follows: nervousness, annoyance, pain, fright, boredom, and tiredness. Answers range from "not" (= 0 points) to "extremely" (= 4 points) (range total score: 0-24). Differences between the procedures were assessed with Friedman test, with subsequent Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The children were also asked which non-invasive test they preferred not to undergo regularly (venipuncture, stool-sampling, or US). Answers were analyzed with χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.