Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34757445›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

An education on pharmacologically active complementary and alternative medicine and its effects on cancer treatment: literature review.

Ellen Simpson, Nijole Bernaitis, Sohil Khan, Gary Grant, Karly Forster, Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer patients' behaviors and attitudes toward natural health products.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023
    Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen SimpsonSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Nijole BernaitisSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Sohil KhanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Gary GrantSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Karly ForsterPharmacy Department, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia.
Shailendra Anoopkumar-DukieSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. s.dukie@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-6664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis literature review examines the provision of an education on pharmacologically active complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs), to people with cancer, their carers and oncology health professionals.

methodsA search of the published literature between 2000 and 2020, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted. The search retrieved 1121 studies, 1080 were excluded based on their title or abstract and 26 articles were excluded based on their text. One article was retrieved from the reference lists of the included articles and in total fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. This review utilised Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Four key outcomes were utilised for analysis and recommendations for future education and/or research were generated. The recommendations were graded according to the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT).

resultsThis review consistently found that people with cancer, their carers and oncology health professionals derived benefit from a pharmacologically active CAM education and recommends that this population receives one. Conversely, the review found many education formats utilised and no consensus on the most successful methods.

conclusionFuture research should examine who a CAM education should be delivered to, what type of delivery platform is most accessible and useful, and the features of the education that most increase CAM knowledge. The popularity of CAMs amongst people with cancer and the potential dangers associated with their use necessitates further research into how best to communicate CAMs to this population.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesNeoplasmsConsensusHealth PersonnelHumansCancerComplementary and alternative medicineEducationEvidenced-basedOncologyOncology health professional

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.