ArticleBiophysical journal2021
Enhancing carrier flux for efficient drug delivery in cancer tissues.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting cancer stages from tissue energy dissipation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound focused toward tumors in the presence of circulating microbubbles improves the delivery of drug-loaded nanoparticles and therapeutic outcomes; however, the efficacy varies among the different properties and conditions of the tumors. Therefore, there is a need to optimize the ultrasound parameters and determine the properties of the tumor tissue important for the successful delivery of nanoparticles. Here, we propose a mesoscopic model considering the presence of entropic forces to explain the ultrasound-enhanced transport of nanoparticles across the capillary wall and through the interstitium of tumors. The nanoparticles move through channels of variable shape whose irregularities can be assimilated to barriers of entropic nature that the nanoparticles must overcome to reach their targets. The model assumes that focused ultrasound and circulating microbubbles cause the capillary wall to oscillate, thereby changing the width of transcapillary and interstitial channels. Our analysis provides values for the penetration distances of nanoparticles into the interstitium that are in agreement with experimental results. We found that the penetration increased significantly with increasing acoustic intensity as well as tissue elasticity, which means softer and more deformable tissue (Young modulus lower than 50 kPa), whereas porosity of the tissue and pulse repetition frequency of the ultrasound had less impact on the penetration length. We also considered that nanoparticles can be absorbed into cells and to extracellular matrix constituents, finding that the penetration length is increased when there is a low absorbance coefficient of the nanoparticles compared with their diffusion coefficient (close to 0.2). The model can be used to predict which tumor types, in terms of elasticity, will successfully deliver nanoparticles into the interstitium. It can also be used to predict the penetration distance into the interstitium of nanoparticles with various sizes and the ultrasound intensity needed for the efficient distribution of the nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.