Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34756795›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

Adaptation of the Pediatric Smell Wheel

Marco A Fornazieri, Lucas K Ebara, Rafael Goulart de Araújo, João Vitor Fernandes Lima, Felipe B Favareto, Fábio R Pinna, Richard L Voegels, Richard L Doty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco A FornazieriUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Departamento de Cirurgia Cliníca, Londrina, PR, Brazil; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC PR), Departamento de Medicina, Londrina, PR, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Departamento de Otorrinolaringolgia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Smell and Test Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: marcofornazieri@uel.br.
Lucas K EbaraUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Departamento de Cirurgia Cliníca, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Rafael Goulart de AraújoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Departamento de Cirurgia Cliníca, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
João Vitor Fernandes LimaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Departamento de Cirurgia Cliníca, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Felipe B FavaretoUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Departamento de Cirurgia Cliníca, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Fábio R PinnaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Departamento de Otorrinolaringolgia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Richard L VoegelsUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Departamento de Otorrinolaringolgia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Richard L DotyUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Smell and Test Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Pennsylvania, USA.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOlfaction influences nutrition, safety, and the cognitive development of children. Presently there are few olfactory tests for children, and normative reference values are generally lacking. In this study, we validate the Pediatric Smell Wheel

methodsWe modified and validated the PSW, a test developed in the United States, for administration in Brazil, and established normative data for Brazilian children. The validation process consisted of five phases. First, we identified odorants familiar to Brazilian children. Second, we established the test-retest reliability of the Brazilian PSW test that employed these odorants. Third, we compared the test scores of healthy children to those microsmic from adenoid hypertrophy. Fourth, we examined the test's ability to detect improvement in olfactory function before and after adenoidectomy. Finally, we determined a normative 10th percentile cut point for defining microsmia in a sample of 169 healthy Brazilian children between 5 and 12 years of age.

resultsEleven odors were identified for inclusion in the test. The test-retest reliability was modest (r = 0.54, p < 0.001), although likely attenuated based on the inclusion of only data from children with normal function. The test clearly differentiated the olfactory function of children with adenoid hypertrophy from that of healthy children and demonstrated the return of function after adenoidectomy. An overall score <7 was found useful in defining hyposmia, although additional age-related cut-points were also defined.

conclusionA Brazilian version of the PSW was developed and validated and found to be efficacious in detecting smell dysfunction in children ranging in age from 5 to 12 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b (Diagnosis).

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersBrazilChildChild, PreschoolHumansHypertrophyReproducibility of ResultsAdenoidsDiagnostic testsNasopharyngeal diseasesOlfaction disordersSmell

Identifiers

PMID34756795
PMCPMC9800946
OpenAlexW3207329907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.