ArticleMedical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
Dose accumulation of daily adaptive plans to decide optimal plan adaptation strategy for head-and-neck patients treated with MR-Linac.
Article in Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer with daily adapt-to-shape workflow on 1.5 T MRI-linac: Preliminary outcomes and comparison with helical tomotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?Radiation oncology journal · 2025Article
- Clinical Experience With an Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy Head and Neck Program: Dosimetric Benefits and Opportunities for Patient Selection.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Article
- Prospects for online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Recommended Reporting Guidance.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Automated tracking of morphologic changes in weekly magnetic resonance imaging during head and neck radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Clinical Implementation and Initial Experience With a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac for MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Cancer: An R-IDEAL Stage 1 and 2a First in Humans Feasibility Study of New Technology Implementation.Practical radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MR-Linacs) allow for superior visualization of soft tissue to guide online adaptive replanning for precise radiotherapy delivery. Elekta Unity MR-Linacs (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) provides 2 plan adaptation approaches, adapt-to-position (ATP), plan reoptimization based on the reference CT with the iso-shift measured from daily MR scans, and adapt-to-shape (ATS), full plan reoptimization based on the re-contoured daily MR scans. Our study aims to close the gap in knowledge regarding the use of the ATP technique in the treatment of head and neck (HN) cancers through the analysis of accumulated dose of daily ATP plans to organs at risk (OARs). Daily accumulated doses of 8 HN patients using deformable registration were analyzed to estimate the actual delivered dose versus the planned dose to evaluate the impact from daily anatomical changes and setup uncertainties. This process was completed through the collection of doses to OARs which were chosen based on the rigidity and size of the organ and the substantial dose it received. Results showed that the actual dose delivered to some OARs was significantly higher than the originally planned dose and was more pronounced in structures that were within the high-dose gradient for some subdisease sites. These findings suggest that the ATS approach should be used for plan adaptation in some specific HN diseases where OARs receive substantial dose with anatomy changes that could not be accounted for by the ATP approach. We also investigated the possibility of predicting the actual delivered dose at an early stage of the treatment course, with the intention of exploring a possibly more optimal alternative for planning through the combination of ATP and ATS approaches throughout treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.