Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34756471›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2022

The cost of diagnosing endometrial cancer: Quantifying the healthcare cost of an abnormal uterine bleeding workup.

Simrit K Warring, Bijan Borah, James Moriarty, Rachel Gullerud, Maureen A Lemens, Christopher Destephano, Mark E Sherman, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rural patients' experiences with diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. To do or not to do? - Endometrial biopsy in younger women with abnormal uterine bleeding.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simrit K WarringDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Bijan BorahKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
James MoriartyKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Rachel GullerudKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Maureen A LemensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Christopher DestephanoDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America.
Mark E ShermanQuantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Jamie N Bakkum-GamezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America. Electronic address: bakkum.jamie@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
CERVICAL CANCER AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) INFECTIONZ01CP010124 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHIFFMAN, MARK · 1996 to 2008
$3.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010124NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe evaluation of women with perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) to detect endometrial cancer (EC) and its precursors is not standardized and can vary widely. Consequently, costs associated with the workup and management undoubtedly vary. This study aimed to quantify costs of AUB/PMB evaluation to understand the healthcare burden associated with securing a pathologic diagnosis.

methodsWomen ≥45 years of age presenting to a single institution gynecology clinic with AUB/PMB for diagnostic workup were prospectively enrolled February 2013-October 2017 for a lower genital tract biospecimen research study. Clinical workup of AUB/PMB was determined by individual provider discretion. Costs of care were collected from administrative billing systems from enrollment to 90 days post enrollment. Costs were standardized and inflation-adjusted to 2017 US Dollars (USD).

resultsIn total, there were 1017 women enrolled with 5.6% diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer (EC). Within the full cohort, 90-day median cost for AUB/PMB workup and management was $2279 (IQR $512-4828). Among patients with a diagnostic biopsy, median 90-day costs ranged from $2203 (IQR $499-3604) for benign or disordered proliferative endometrium (DPE) diagnosis to $21,039 (IQR $19,084-24,536) for a diagnosis of EC.

conclusionsThe costs for diagnostic evaluation of perimenopausal AUB and PMB vary greatly according to ultimate tissue-based diagnosis. Even reassuring benign findings that do not require further intervention-the most common in this study's cohort-yield substantial costs. The development of sensitive, specific, and more cost-effective diagnostic strategies is warranted.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsBiopsyCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMinnesotaPerimenopausePrecancerous ConditionsProspective StudiesUterine HemorrhageCostEndometrial cancerPerimenopausal abnormal uterine bleedingPostmenopausal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID34756471
PMCPMC8724459
OpenAlexW3210761567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.