Postscript: Women's Health and the Era After COVID-19.

Denisse S Holcomb, William F Rayburn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

The covid-19 pandemic and the usability of telehealth in a midlife women's health integrated care program.Maturitas · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denisse S HolcombDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: denisse.holcomb@utsouthwestern.edu.

William F RayburnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the world clamored to respond to the rapidly evolving coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, health care systems reacted swiftly to provide uninterrupted care for patients. Within obstetrics and gynecology, nearly every facet of care was influenced. Rescheduling of office visits, safety of labor and delivery and in the operating room, and implementation of telemedicine are examples. Social distancing has impacted academic centers in the education of trainees. COVID-19 vaccine trials have increased awareness of including pregnant and lactating women. Last, the pandemic has reminded us of issues related to ethics, diversity and inclusiveness, marginalized communities, and the women's health workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansLactationPregnancySARS-CoV-2Women's HealthCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19FutureMedical educationObstetrics & gynecologyPractice changeSafetyTelehealthVaccinations

Identifiers

PMID34756299

DOI10.1016/j.ogc.2021.06.002

PMCPMC8249681

OpenAlexW3178782005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.