Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34756093›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021

Differences in IgG Antibody Responses following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.

José G Montoya, Amy E Adams, Valérie Bonetti, Sien Deng, Nan A Link, Suzanne Pertsch, Kjerstie Olson, Martina Li, Ellis C Dillon, Dominick L Frosch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Reply to LiaoAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José G MontoyaDr. Jack S. Remington Laboratory for Specialty Diagnostics, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-8071
Amy E AdamsPalo Alto Foundation Medical Group, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Valérie BonettiDr. Jack S. Remington Laboratory for Specialty Diagnostics, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sien DengCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Nan A LinkPalo Alto Foundation Medical Group, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Suzanne PertschPalo Alto Foundation Medical Group, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Kjerstie OlsonDr. Jack S. Remington Laboratory for Specialty Diagnostics, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Martina LiCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Ellis C DillonCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Dominick L FroschCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sutter Health · USPalo Alto Institute · US

Funding

Sutter Health | Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies examining antibody responses by vaccine brand are lacking and may be informative for optimizing vaccine selection, dosage, and regimens. The purpose of this study is to assess IgG antibody responses following immunization with BNT162b2 (30 μg mRNA) and mRNA-1273 (100 μg mRNA) vaccines. A cohort of clinicians at a nonprofit organization is being assessed clinically and serologically following immunization with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. IgG responses were measured at the Remington Laboratory by an IgG assay against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-receptor binding domain. Mixed-effect linear (MEL) regression modeling was used to examine whether the SARS-CoV-2 IgG level differed by vaccine brand, dosage, or number of days since vaccination. Among 532 SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants, 530 (99.6%) seroconverted with either vaccine. After adjustments for age and gender, MEL regression modeling revealed that the average IgG antibody level increased after the second dose compared to the first dose (

Indexed as

Antibody Formation2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273AdultAgedAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesProspective Studies2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antibodiesBNT162b2COVID-19IgGmRNA-1273SARS-CoV-2vaccinevaccines

Identifiers

PMID34756093
PMCPMC8579939
OpenAlexW3214392375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.