ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021
Validation of Selective Agars for Detection and Quantification of Escherichia coli Strains Resistant to Critically Important Antimicrobials.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-resolution characterization of the temporal and spatial distribution of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Directed Evolution of AtMP2 Peptide: Unlocking Enhanced Antibacterial Potential fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Microgap Size and Microbial Microleakage at the Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface in Original and Compatible Abutments.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal dissemination of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales in municipal sewer systems: a prospective, longitudinal study in the city of Basel, Switzerland.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in diverse foodstuffs: a prospective, longitudinal study in the city of Basel, Switzerland.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Success in the global fight against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is likely to improve if surveillance can be performed on an epidemiological scale. An approach based on agars with incorporated antimicrobials has enormous potential to achieve this. However, there is a need to identify the combinations of selective agars and key antimicrobials yielding the most accurate counts of susceptible and resistant organisms. A series of experiments involving 1,202 plates identified the best candidate combinations from six commercially available agars and five antimicrobials, using 18 Escherichia coli strains as either pure cultures or inocula-spiked feces. The effects of various design factors on colony counts were analyzed in generalized linear models. Without antimicrobials, Brilliance E. coli and CHROMagar ECC agars yielded 28.9% and 23.5% more colonies, respectively, than MacConkey agar. The order of superiority of agars remained unchanged when fecal samples with or without spiking of resistant E. coli strains were inoculated onto agars with or without specific antimicrobials. When antimicrobials were incorporated at various concentrations, it was revealed that ampicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin were suitable for incorporation into Brilliance and CHROMagar agars at all defined concentrations. Gentamicin was suitable for incorporation only at 8 and 16 μg/ml, while ceftiofur was suitable only at 1 μg/ml. CHROMagar extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) agar supported growth of a wider diversity of extended-spectrum-cephalosporin-resistant E. coli strains. The findings demonstrate the potential for agars with incorporated antimicrobials to be combined with laboratory-based robotics to deliver AMR surveillance on a vast scale with greater sensitivity of detection and strategic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.