Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34755816›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2021

Effectiveness of surveillance cultures for high priority multidrug-resistant bacteria in hematopoietic stem cell transplant units.

Elisa Teixeira Mendes, Matias Chiarastelli Salomão, Lísia Moura Tomichi, Maura Salaroli Oliveira, Mariana Graça, Flavia Rossi, Fernanda Sapadao, Thais Guimarães, Vanderson Rocha, Silvia Figueiredo Costa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa Teixeira MendesPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Centro de Ciências da Vida, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-8185
Matias Chiarastelli SalomãoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lísia Moura TomichiUniversidade do Rio Verde, Hospital de Doenças Tropicais, Aparecida de Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Maura Salaroli OliveiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana GraçaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Laboratório de Microbiologia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flavia RossiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório Central, Divisão de Microbiologia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda SapadaoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thais GuimarãesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanderson RochaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Silvia Figueiredo CostaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-752X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas · BRUniversidade de Rio Verde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance strategies to detect colonization are an important tool to prevent and control the spread of microorganisms in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) units. The aim of this study was to evaluate routine surveillance cultures for screening colonization and infection by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPa), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Surveillance cultures were collected (1,323 samples) from 200 patients admitted to an HSCT unit over one year; swabs were taken on admission and then weekly. We compared the positivity of cultures for each site, agent, clinical and epidemiological data according to the colonization status. Infection due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) occurred in 52 (21.5%) patients, 45 (86.5%) due to blood stream infection; 12 (23%) patients had a positive surveillance culture before the infection. Cultures of 554 (41.8%) samples were performed for CRPa, 413 (31.2%) for VRE and 356 (27%) for CRE. Of these, 179 (13.5%) were positive. Colonization by any MDRO, CRE or CRPa was associated with increased risk of infection (P < 0.05), but not with death. Previous colonization by an MDRO was a significant risk for infection by these pathogens, specially by CRE. Overall, rectal swabs had the highest positivity rate compared with other sites, oropharynx swabs were an option for CRPa, and fecal cultures showed low positivity. Although the impact of the strategy on the mortality of patients undergoing HSCT is not clear, routine VRE surveillance should be questioned with regard to patients undergoing auto-HSCT due to the additional cost and little impact on survival rates.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsVancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Identifiers

PMID34755816
PMCPMC8580484
OpenAlexW3214525263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.