Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34755759›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2021

Relationship between vitamin D deficiency and psychophysiological variables: a systematic review of the literature.

Mariluce Rodrigues Marques Silva, Waleska Maria Almeida Barros, Mayara Luclécia da Silva, José Maurício Lucas da Silva, Ana Patrícia da Silva Souza, Ana Beatriz Januário da Silva, Matheus Santos de Sousa Fernandes, Sandra Lopes de Souza, Viviane de Oliveira Nogueira Souza

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariluce Rodrigues Marques SilvaPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Neuropsiquiatria e Ciencias do Comportamento, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-4352-7120
Waleska Maria Almeida BarrosPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Neuropsiquiatria e Ciencias do Comportamento, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-8165
Mayara Luclécia da SilvaCentro Integrado de Tecnologias em Neurociencia (CITENC), Centro Universitario Osman Lins (UNIFACOL), Vitoria de Santo Antao, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0686-2635
José Maurício Lucas da SilvaCentro Integrado de Tecnologias em Neurociencia (CITENC), Centro Universitario Osman Lins (UNIFACOL), Vitoria de Santo Antao, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-4508-3589
Ana Patrícia da Silva SouzaPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Neuropsiquiatria e Ciencias do Comportamento, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-3144-2616
Ana Beatriz Januário da SilvaPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Neuropsiquiatria e Ciencias do Comportamento, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-647X
Matheus Santos de Sousa FernandesPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Neuropsiquiatria e Ciencias do Comportamento, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-1066-9176
Sandra Lopes de SouzaPrograma de Pos-graduacao em Neuropsiquiatria e Ciencias do Comportamento, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-5695-7344
Viviane de Oliveira Nogueira SouzaNucleo de Nutricao, Centro Academico de Vitoria (CAV), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Vitoria de Santo Antao, PE, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-9559-5208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that plays a role not only in calcium homeostasis, but also in several other functions, including cell growth and immune functions, and is considered a neurosteroid. Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent worldwide and has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of emotional disorders. Therefore, the association between vitamin D levels and psychophysiological disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and mood, has been investigated. To list these variables, a bibliographical literature research was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and PsycINFO databases, between November and December 2020, with no year limits of publication. The studies involved humans aged between 18 and 59 years without associated diseases. This review presents evidence of the main variables involved in this association, main tools used to verify these variables, and methods used to verify circulating vitamin D levels in populations. Most studies have indicated that the main psychophysiological variables involved with vitamin D levels are depression and anxiety followed by mood, and an association has been observed between increased serum vitamin D levels and reduction in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and mood, and there is a heterogeneity of methods for assessing vitamin D. More studies are clearly needed to improve our understanding of their role in modulating the psychophysiological aspects of vitamin D levels.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsVitamin D DeficiencyAdolescentAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansMiddle AgedVitamin DYoung AdultBone Density Conservation AgentsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID34755759
PMCPMC8552952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.