Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34755519›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Benefit-Risk of Rivaroxaban for Extended Thromboprophylaxis After Hospitalization for Medical Illness: Pooled Analysis From MAGELLAN and MARINER.

Gary E Raskob, Alex C Spyropoulos, Theodore E Spiro, Wentao Lu, Zhong Yuan, Bennett Levitan, Eunyoung Suh, Elliot S Barnathan

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Adherence to Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients in Uruguay: First Nationwide Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gary E RaskobHudson College of Public HealthUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City OK.ORCID 0000-0002-5126-0991
Alex C SpyropoulosDepartment of Medicine, Anticoagulation and Clinical Thrombosis Services Northwell Health at Lenox Hill HospitalThe Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research New York NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3175-461X
Theodore E SpiroThrombosis and Hematology Therapeutic Area Clinical Development Pharmaceuticals Bayer U.S. LLC Whippany NJ.
Wentao LuJanssen Research and Development LLC Raritan NJ.
Zhong YuanJanssen Research and Development LLC Titusville NJ.
Bennett LevitanJanssen Research and Development LLC Titusville NJ.
Eunyoung SuhJanssen Research and Development LLC Raritan NJ.
Elliot S BarnathanJanssen Research and Development LLC Raritan NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-1486
Janssen (United States) · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USThrombosis Research Institute · GBUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Thromboprophylaxis extended after hospital discharge in medically ill patients currently is not recommended by practice guidelines because of uncertainty about the benefit for preventing major or fatal thromboembolic events, and the risk of bleeding. Methods and Results We assessed the benefit and risk of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily extended for 25 to 45 days after hospitalization for preventing major thromboembolism in medically ill patients using the pooled data in 16 496 patients from 2 randomized trials, MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk) and MAGELLAN (Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group efficacy and safety study for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medically ill patients comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin). The data from the MARINER trial were pooled with the data from the MAGELLAN trial in patients who were free of thrombotic or bleeding events up to the last dose of enoxaparin/placebo and who continued in the outpatient phase of thromboprophylaxis. The composite outcome of major thromboembolic events (symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and nonhemorrhagic stroke) and all-cause mortality was used to assess benefit and was compared with the risk of the composite of fatal and critical site bleeding. The incidence of the composite efficacy outcome was 1.80% (148 of 8222 patients) in the rivaroxaban group, compared with 2.31% (191 of 8274 patients in the placebo group) (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.97],

Indexed as

Venous ThromboembolismAftercareAnticoagulantsEnoxaparinHemorrhageHospitalizationHumansPatient DischargeRisk FactorsRivaroxabanAnticoagulantsEnoxaparinRivaroxabananticoagulantsbleedingrivaroxabanthromboembolismthromboprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID34755519
PMCPMC8751917
OpenAlexW3214010030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.