ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022
Erdafitinib's effect on serum phosphate justifies its pharmacodynamically guided dosing in patients with cancer.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibition for succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Evaluating Debio 1347 in Patients with FGFR Fusion-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors from the FUZE Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Basket Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Trial
- Erdafitinib in patients with advanced solid tumours with FGFR alterations (RAGNAR): an international, single-arm, phase 2 study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2023Trial
- A Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Dose Study of the Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Erdafitinib, an FGFR Inhibitor.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2026Article
- FGFR3 alterations in bladder cancer: Sensitivity and resistance to targeted therapies.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2024Review
- Machine Learning Methods for Precision Dosing in Anticancer Drug Therapy: A Scoping Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2023Review
- Article
- Erdafitinib's effect on serum phosphate justifies its pharmacodynamically guided dosing in patients with cancer.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
- Quantitative approaches to drug safety: The 2022 PSP special issue.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A population pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed using data from 345 patients with cancer. The population PK-PD model evaluated the effect of erdafitinib total and free plasma concentrations on serum phosphate concentrations after once-daily oral continuous (0.5-12 mg) and intermittent (10-12 mg for 7 days on/7 days off) dosing, and investigated the potential covariates affecting erdafitinib-related changes in serum phosphate levels. Phosphate is used as a biomarker for erdafitinib's efficacy and safety: increases in serum phosphate were observed after dosing with erdafitinib, which were associated with fibroblast growth factor receptor target engagement via inhibition of renal fibroblast growth factor 23-mediated signaling. PK-PD model-based simulations were performed to assess the approved PD-guided dosing algorithm of erdafitinib (8 mg once-daily continuous dosing, with up-titration to 9 mg based on phosphate levels [<5.5 mg/dl] and tolerability at 14-21 days of treatment). The serum phosphate concentrations increased after the first dose and reached near maximal level after 14 days of continuous treatment. Serum phosphate increased with erdafitinib free drug concentrations: doubling the free concentration resulted in a 1.8-fold increase in drug-related phosphate changes. Dose adjustment after at least 14 days of dosing was supported by achievement of >95% maximal serum phosphate concentration. The peak-to-trough fluctuation within a dosing interval was limited for serum phosphate concentrations (5.68-5.65 mg/dl on Day 14), supporting phosphate monitoring at any time relative to dosing. Baseline phosphate was higher in women, otherwise, none of the investigated covariate-parameter relationships were considered clinically relevant. Simulations suggest that the starting dose of 8-mg with up-titration to 9-mg on Days 14-21 maximized the number of patients within the target serum phosphate concentrations (5.5-7 mg/dl) while limiting the number of treatment interruptions. The findings from the PK-PD model provided a detailed understanding of the erdafitinib concentration-related phosphate changes over time, which supports erdafitinib's dosing algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.