ArticleMedical physics2022
Automatic quadriceps and patellae segmentation of MRI with cascaded U
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning-based approach for measuring patellar cartilage deformations from knee MR images.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- Enhancing Orthopedic Knowledge Assessments: The Performance of Specialized Generative Language Model Optimization.Current medical science · 2024Article
- Efficient musculoskeletal annotation using free-form deformation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- UMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The segmentation and intelligent recognition of structural surfaces in borehole images based on the U2-Net network.PloS one · 2024Article
- Semi-automatic muscle segmentation in MR images using deep registration-based label propagation.Pattern recognition · 2023Article
- Automated segmentation of the healed anterior cruciate ligament from TJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023Article
- Deep Learning-Based Medical Images Segmentation of Musculoskeletal Anatomical Structures: A Survey of Bottlenecks and Strategies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutomatic muscle segmentation is critical for advancing our understanding of human physiology, biomechanics, and musculoskeletal pathologies, as it allows for timely exploration of large multi-dimensional image sets. Segmentation models are rarely developed/validated for the pediatric model. As such, autosegmentation is not available to explore how muscle architectural changes during development and how disease/pathology affects the developing musculoskeletal system. Thus, we aimed to develop and validate an end-to-end, fully automated, deep learning model for accurate segmentation of the rectus femoris and vastus lateral, medialis, and intermedialis using a pediatric database.
methodsWe developed a two-stage cascaded deep learning model in a coarse-to-fine manner. In the first stage, the U
resultsThe mid-resolution second stage produced the best results for the vastus medialis, rectus femoris, and patella (Dice similarity coefficient = 95.0%, 95.1%, 93.7%), whereas the low-resolution second stage produced the best results for the vastus lateralis and vastus intermedialis (DSC = 94.5% and 93.7%). In comparing the low- to mid-resolution cases, the vasti intermedialis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, and patella produced significant differences (p = 0.0015, p = 0.0101, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0003) and the vasti lateralis did not (p = 0.2177). The high-resolution stage 2 had significantly lower accuracy (1.0 to 4.4 dice percentage points) compared to both the mid- and low-resolution routines (p value ranged from < 0.001 to 0.04). The one exception was the rectus femoris, where there was no difference between the low- and high-resolution cases. The ablation study demonstrated that the multifeature is more reliable than the single feature.
conclusionsOur successful implementation of this two-stage segmentation pipeline provides a critical tool for expanding pediatric muscle physiology and clinical research. With a relatively small and variable dataset, our fully automatic segmentation technique produces accuracies that matched or exceeded the current state of the art. The two-stage segmentation avoids memory issues and excessive run times by using a first stage focused on cropping out unnecessary data. The excellent Dice similarity coefficients improve upon previous template-based automatic and semiautomatic methodologies targeting the leg musculature. More importantly, with a naturally variable dataset (size, shape, etc.), the proposed model demonstrates slightly improved accuracies, compared to previous neural networks methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.