Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34755294›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Evaluation of acid mine drainage sludge as soil substitute for the reclamation of mine solid wastes.

Yihan Chi, Qinru Lin, Rongchuan Zhuang, Mingyu Xiong, Zhihong Ye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yihan Chi *State Key Laboratory for Comprehensive Utilization of Low-Grade Refractory Gold Ores, Longyan, 364200, Fujian, China.
Qinru Lin *School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Rongchuan ZhuangState Key Laboratory for Comprehensive Utilization of Low-Grade Refractory Gold Ores, Longyan, 364200, Fujian, China.
Mingyu XiongState Key Laboratory for Comprehensive Utilization of Low-Grade Refractory Gold Ores, Longyan, 364200, Fujian, China.
Zhihong YeSchool of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. lssyzhh@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reclamation of mine waste deposits is often hindered by the scarcity of natural topsoil. Acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS), as a mass-produced waste in metalliferous mines, is a potential topsoil substitute but had not been validated. In this study, a pot experiment with three plant species was conducted to evaluate the capacity of AMDS to support plant growth, buffer acidification, and immobilize heavy metal(loid)s when reclaiming mine waste rocks. Chemical fertilizer and compost chicken manure were applied to AMDS at different rates to explore their effects on plant growth and the physicochemical properties of AMDS. Results showed that all the plants could survive in AMDS even without fertilization. The contents of heavy metal(loid)s in rhizosphere remained almost unchanged over the experimental period, indicating low leachability of revegetated AMDS. Fertilizers enhanced macronutrients and soil enzyme activities, leading to significant increases in plant biomass. However, owing to manure composting and low richness and diversity of the bacterial community in AMDS, the NH

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsSewageSoilSolid WasteMetals, HeavySewageSoilSoil PollutantsSolid WasteAcid mine drainage sludgeHeavy metal(loid)Mine reclamationSoil fertilitySoil microbeSoil substitute

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.