Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34755285›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2022

NetFACS: Using network science to understand facial communication systems.

Alexander Mielke, Bridget M Waller, Claire Pérez, Alan V Rincon, Julie Duboscq, Jérôme Micheletta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. More than just smiling: how positive emotions are expressed on the face.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander MielkeDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Comparative and Evolutionary Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8847-6665
Bridget M WallerDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-7458
Claire PérezDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Comparative and Evolutionary Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK.
Alan V RinconDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Comparative and Evolutionary Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6181-0152
Julie DuboscqUMR7206 Eco-Anthropology, CNRS-MNHN-Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6342-6709
Jérôme MichelettaDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Comparative and Evolutionary Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-6781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding facial signals in humans and other species is crucial for understanding the evolution, complexity, and function of the face as a communication tool. The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) enables researchers to measure facial movements accurately, but we currently lack tools to reliably analyse data and efficiently communicate results. Network analysis can provide a way to use the information encoded in FACS datasets: by treating individual AUs (the smallest units of facial movements) as nodes in a network and their co-occurrence as connections, we can analyse and visualise differences in the use of combinations of AUs in different conditions. Here, we present 'NetFACS', a statistical package that uses occurrence probabilities and resampling methods to answer questions about the use of AUs, AU combinations, and the facial communication system as a whole in humans and non-human animals. Using highly stereotyped facial signals as an example, we illustrate some of the current functionalities of NetFACS. We show that very few AUs are specific to certain stereotypical contexts; that AUs are not used independently from each other; that graph-level properties of stereotypical signals differ; and that clusters of AUs allow us to reconstruct facial signals, even when blind to the underlying conditions. The flexibility and widespread use of network analysis allows us to move away from studying facial signals as stereotyped expressions, and towards a dynamic and differentiated approach to facial communication.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionMovementAnimalsHumansCommunicationFacial action coding systemFacial signalsNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID34755285
PMCPMC9374617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.