Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754964›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2021

Starch supplementation improves the reproductive performance of sows in different glucose tolerance status.

Yunyu Yang, Ming Deng, Jianzhao Chen, Xichen Zhao, Kaili Xiao, Wenliang He, Xinggang Qiu, Yanzhen Xu, Yulong Yin, Chengquan Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yunyu YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
Ming DengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
Jianzhao ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
Xichen ZhaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
Kaili XiaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
Wenliang HeDepartments of Animal Science and of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Xinggang QiuGuangdong Natural Industry Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511363, China.
Yanzhen XuCenter of Experimental Teaching for Basic Courses, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yulong YinNational Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Chengquan TanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangdong Food Industry Research Institute · CNTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the effects of glucose tolerance status, maternal starch supplementation and soybean substitution in diets on the performance of dams and their offspring. Eighty-eight pregnant sows (Landrace × Large White) were selected from an initial total of 120 sows, based on blood glucose test values, and assigned to 4 experimental treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design. The factors were glucose tolerance status (glucose intolerant [GIT] vs. normal glucose tolerant [NGT]) or dietary treatments (corn starch diet [CS] vs. soybean substitution diet [SS]). A higher area under the curve (AUC) for post-meal glucose was observed (

Indexed as

Glucose toleranceInsulin resistanceSowSoybean substitutionStarchStillbirth rate

Identifiers

PMID34754964
PMCPMC8556606
OpenAlexW3195380452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.