ArticleArchive of clinical cases2020
Permanent pacemaker implantation in a challenging anatomy: Persistent left superior vena cava.
Article in Archive of clinical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pacemaker Implantation in a Patient With Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: A Novel Approach.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Double Superior Vena Cava Due to Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Incidentally Identified on Central Venous Catheterization: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2022Article
- Pacemaker Implantation in a Patient with Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Draining into the Left Atrium: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Active fixation of bipolar left ventricular lead through a persistent left superior vena cava.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The persistence of the left superior vena cava is one of the most common abnormalities that could affect the thoracic venous return, despite its rare occurrence. It can usually be found as the only or in combination with other congenital cardiac abnormalities. Even though it is usually asymptomatic and it rarely has important consequences on the hemodynamics, it could sometimes represent a serious threat. In this regard, PLSVC often represents an incidental finding during an invasive procedure or imaging. We present an interesting case of a 66-year-old patient, with permanent atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease who presented to our clinic for a syncope due to complete atrioventricular block. The implant procedure was marked by the incidental intraprocedural finding of unusual venous anatomy. This anomaly included the absence of the superior vena cava, with the communication of the right brachiocephalic trunk and right subclavian vein with a persistent left superior vena cava which drainage directly into the coronary sinus. The right-side approach, as well as the limitation of using contrast-based venography, due to the kidney disease, made the procedure more difficult, but the final position of an active fixation ventricular lead was successfully achieved with optimal and stable pacing parameters through the formation of a particular curve of the lead stylet. Persistence of the left superior vena cava is a venous anomaly, which is frequently suspicioned at transthoracic echocardiography examination when the examiner found a dilated coronary sinus but diagnosed on the implant table of a cardiac device. These anomalies can pose problems and exponentially increase the procedural time even in experienced hands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.