Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754823›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2021

Katherine R Landwehr, Jessica Hillas, Ryan Mead-Hunter, Peter Brooks, Andrew King, Rebecca A O'Leary, Anthony Kicic, Benjamin J Mullins, Alexander N Larcombe, AusREC and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine R LandwehrOccupation, Environment and Safety, School of Population Health, Curtin University, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.
Jessica HillasRespiratory Environmental Health, Wal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Ryan Mead-HunterOccupation, Environment and Safety, School of Population Health, Curtin University, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.
Peter BrooksSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew KingFluid Dynamics Research Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Rebecca A O'LearyDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Perth, Western Australia 6151, Australia.
Anthony KicicOccupation, Environment and Safety, School of Population Health, Curtin University, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.
Benjamin J MullinsOccupation, Environment and Safety, School of Population Health, Curtin University, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.
Alexander N LarcombeOccupation, Environment and Safety, School of Population Health, Curtin University, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.
AusREC
WAERP
Curtin University · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The method outlined in this article is a customization of the whole exhaust exposure method generated by Mullins et al. (2016) using reprogrammed primary human airway epithelial cells as described by Martinovich et al. (2017). It has been used successfully to generate recently published data (Landwehr et al. 2021). The goal was to generate an exhaust exposure model where exhaust is collected from a modern engine, real-world exhaust concentrations are used and relevant tissues exposed to assess the effects of multiple biodiesel exposures. Exhaust was generated, gently vacuumed into a dilution chamber where it was diluted 1/15 with air and then vacuumed into an incubator containing the primary cell cultures for exposure. Exhaust physico-chemical properties including combustion gas concentrations and particle spectra were then analyzed using a combustion gas analyzer and a Universal Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer. 24 h after exposure, cellular viability and mediator release were measured using Annexin-V/PI staining and meditator multiplexing kits respectively. This method was generated to test biodiesel exhaust exposures but can be easily adapted for any type of engine exhaust exposure or even potentially other respirable environmental exposures such as woodsmoke. The main customization points for this method are:•Exhaust generated by a diesel engine equipped with EURO VI exhaust after treatment devices including diesel particulate filter and diesel oxidation catalyst.•The generated exhaust was diluted 1/15 with air to replicate real world exposure concentrations.•Used primary human airway epithelial cells obtained from bronchoscope brushings from multiple volunteers and reprogrammed to allow multiple, comparative exposures from the same individual.

Indexed as

Airway epithelial cellsBiodieselEnvironmental exposureExhaust exposureExposure protocol

Identifiers

PMID34754823
PMCPMC8563817
OpenAlexW3209355032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.