ArticleMethodsX2021
Methodology for performing biomechanical push-out tests for evaluating the osseointegration of calvarial defect repair in small animal models.
Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of a fixture for precise perpendicular cuts in bone-implant sample preparation.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Bone regenerative efficacy of binder-jet fabricated hydroxyapatite granules with and without biomimetic octacalcium phosphate-coated modification in a rat critical-sized calvarial defect model.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Review
- High-throughput bioprinting of spheroids for scalable tissue fabrication.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- The Current Status, Prospects, and Challenges of Shape Memory Polymers Application in Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a self-fitting, shape memory polymer scaffold in a rabbit calvarial defect model.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Push-out tests are frequently used to evaluate the bone-implant interfacial strength of orthopedic implants, particularly dental and craniomaxillofacial applications. There currently is no standard method for performing push-out tests on calvarial models, leading to a variety of inconsistent approaches. In this study, fixtures and methods were developed to perform push-out tests in accordance with the following design objectives: (i) the system rigidly fixes the explanted calvarial sample, (ii) it minimizes lateral bending, (iii) it positions the defect accurately, and (iv) it permits verification of the coaxial alignment of the defect with the push-out rod. The fixture and method was first validated by completing push-out experiments on 30 explanted murine cranial caps and two explanted leporine cranial caps, all induced with bilateral sub-critical defects (5.0 mm and 8.0 mm nominal diameter for the murine and leporine models, respectively). Defects were treated with an autograft (i.e., excised tissue flap), a shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffold, or a PEEK implant. Additional validation was performed on 24 murine cranial caps induced with a single, unilateral critically-sized defect (8.0 mm nominal diameter) and treated with an autograft or a SMP scaffold.•A novel fixture was developed for performing push-out mechanical tests to characterize the strength of a bone-implant interface in calvarial defect repair.•The fixture uses a 3D printed vertical clamp with mating alignment component to fix the sample in place without inducing lateral bending and verify coaxial alignment of push-out rod with the defect.•The fixture can be scaled to different calvarial defect geometries as validated with 5.0 mm bilateral and 8.0 mm single diameter murine calvarial defect model and 8.0 mm bilateral leporine calvarial defect model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.