ArticleCureus2021
Utility of Clinical and Ultrasonographic Hip Screening in Neonates for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Clinical Predictors and the Impact of a Screening Protocol.Cureus · 2026Article
- Ultrasonography and the Reorientation of Developmental Hip Dysplasia Research: An NLP-NMF Trend Analysis (1980-2024).The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip in Al Jouf province, Saudi Arabia.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Agreement between physical examination and dynamic sonography in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Article
- Universal ultrasound screening and early treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a critical review.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a musculoskeletal condition occupying any point along a spectrum of anatomical abnormalities that alter the stability of the newborn hip. Presentation varies throughout infancy and the majority of cases, especially those that are mild in nature, tend to resolve without intervention. An analysis of outcomes was conducted on infants born over a two-year period at a single-center, community hospital in East Toronto. The unwritten norm at the institution has become to order hip ultrasonography for all infants born in the breech position through C-section. Given the healthcare expenditure associated with routine radiographic screening, a careful analysis was undertaken to ascertain whether this screening regimen was effective in preventing late-stage detection of advanced DDH and improving organization in patient management. There were a total of 4236 babies delivered over the two years. One-hundred sixty-four (164) babies were born breech and through C-section. Eight (8) babies had abnormal hip examinations, one of whom was ultimately diagnosed with DDH. Forty-six (46) babies showed abnormal hip ultrasound at six weeks. Seventeen (17) referrals were made to the orthopedic surgeon. This resulted in a total of seven cases of DDH being diagnosed over the two years. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical hip screening were 14.3% and 95.5%, respectively, while that for ultrasound screening was 100% and 75.2%. To improve the quality of care and detection of DDH, a risk factor analysis was conducted to retrospectively analyze which DDH cases would have been missed if a higher threshold to ordering hip ultrasonography had been used. Based on the test characteristics of clinical and ultrasonographic screening, held in conjunction with the risk factor analysis results, an altered screening regimen was proposed with the intention of being just as sensitive but more cost-effective. This regimen integrates clinical screening using Barlow and Ortalani maneuvers until the eight to 10-week period and examines for limited abduction from eight weeks onward. Adjuncts like the Galeazzi test and that for asymmetrical skin folds should also be included to increase the sensitivity of clinical screening. Ultrasonography is proposed for high-risk individuals, with the criteria for stratification as high-risk being extracted from the risk factor analysis. Ultrasound is also proposed to be done in a serial fashion prior to orthopedic surgery referral in cases where the age of the infant allows, which serves to better evaluate the risk for lasting DDH and understand the longitudinal trajectory of the patient. This serves the additional purpose of decreasing the psychosocial burden on families. This can be particularly significant for infants for whom the initial abnormalities are due to self-resolve with the maturation of the hip joint and the infant's growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.