Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754642›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Experience.

Eduardo E Lovo, Alejandra Moreira, Kaory C Barahona, Juliana Ramirez, Fidel Campos, Carlos Tobar, Victor Caceros, Morena Sallabanda, Kita Sallabanda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eduardo E LovoRadiosurgery/Neurosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV.
Alejandra MoreiraNeurosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV.
Kaory C BarahonaRadiation Oncology, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV.
Juliana RamirezRadiosurgery, Robotic Radiosurgery Center, San Jose, CRI.
Fidel CamposRadiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV.
Carlos TobarRadiation Oncology, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV.
Victor CacerosRadiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV.
Morena SallabandaRadiation Oncology, Quirónsalud Proton Therapy Centre, Madrid, ESP.
Kita SallabandaRadiosurgery/Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, ESP.
Neurology, Inc · USHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid · ESQueen Square Radiosurgery Centre · GBThe Radiosurgery Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary malignancy of the central nervous system. Despite standard therapy protocols, such as aggressive surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, GBM's aggressive nature produces low survival rates. Tumor recurrence and progression are nearly universal. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been studied as an alternative treatment for recurrent GBM as a minimally invasive option that might prolong survival. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of SRS as a treatment modality considering overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM who had tumor recurrence and were treated with SRS in three different institutions. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who received SRS for recurrent GBM between 1992 and 2020. A total of 46 patients were included in this study. We recorded age at diagnosis, the extent of surgical resection, radiation treatment, chemotherapy regimen, Karnofsky Performance Status at the time of SRS and at last follow-up, use of adjuvant chemotherapy after SRS, and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Primary endpoints were OS after initial diagnosis and OS from the date of the SRS procedure. Results Patients received SRS at a median of 10 months (range, 1 to 94 months) after their initial diagnoses. Median follow-up was seven months from the time of SRS and 22.8 months since diagnosis. The estimated median OS for all patients was nine months (range, 1 to 42 months) after SRS and 23.8 months (range, 4 to 102 months) after diagnosis. Median OS after SRS was seven months for patients treated from 1992 to 2011 and nine months for those treated from 2012 to 2020 (p = 0.008; X

Indexed as

cyberknifegamma knifeglioblastomarecurrencestereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34754642
PMCPMC8569687
OpenAlexW3201883369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.