Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754429›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2021

Developing a patient-centred tool for pain measurement and evaluation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Ragada El-Damanawi, Michael Lee, Tess Harris, Laura B Cowley, Ingrid Scholtes, Simon Bond, Richard N Sandford, Ian B Wilkinson, Niek F Casteleijn, Marie C Hogan and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02933268 (Determining Feasibility of Randomisation to High vs ad Libitum Water Intake in Polycystic Kidney Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02933268 nacompletednot on this map

Determining Feasibility of Randomisation to High vs ad Libitum Water Intake in Polycystic Kidney Disease: The DRINK Randomised Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2016 to 2018Enrolled42ConditionsAutosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney DiseaseArmsHigh water intake, Ad libitum water intake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Step Ahead toward Measuring Pain in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD).Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ragada El-DamanawiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michael LeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tess HarrisPKD Charity, London, UK.
Laura B CowleyCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Ingrid ScholtesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Simon BondCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Richard N SandfordDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ian B WilkinsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Niek F CasteleijnDepartment of Nephrology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marie C HoganDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Fiona E Karet FranklDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas F HiemstraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain affects 60% of the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) population. Despite being an early and debilitating symptom, it is poorly characterized and management is suboptimal. This study aimed to develop an ADPKD-specific pain assessment tool (APAT) to facilitate pain research.

methodsFollowing a systematic review of PATs used in ADPKD studies and against international recommendations for pain trials, our multi-disciplinary team of clinical experts and patients constructed an ADPKD-pain conceptual framework of key pain evaluation themes. We compiled a new APAT covering domains prioritized within our framework using components of questionnaires validated in other chronic pain disorders. The APAT was administered longitudinally within a randomized high-water intake trial (NCT02933268) to ascertain feasibility and provide pilot data on ADPKD pain.

resultsThirty-nine ADPKD participants with chronic kidney disease Stages 1-4 provided 129 APAT responses. Each participant completed a median of 3 (range 1-10) assessments. Respondents' mean ± standard deviation age was 47 ± 13 years; 59% (23) were female; and 69% (27) had enlarged kidneys with median time from diagnosis 14.2 (interquartile range 7.0-25.9) years. Pain (52%) and associated analgesic use (29%) were common. Pain severity was associated with increasing age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.07, P = 0.009], female gender (OR = 4.34, P = 0.018), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsThe APAT demonstrated good acceptability and reliability, and following further validation in a larger cohort could represent an invaluable tool for future ADPKD pain studies.

Indexed as

ADPKDanalgesiachronic painpainpatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34754429
PMCPMC8573025
OpenAlexW3127231889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.