Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754409›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Relationship between Circle of Willis Variations and Cerebral or Cervical Arteries Stenosis Investigated by Computer Tomography Angiography and Multitask Convolutional Neural Network.

Jin Hou, Ming Yong Gao, Ai Zhen Pan, Qiu Dian Wang, Bin Liu, Ya Bin Jin, Jia Bin Lu, Qing Yuan He, Xiao Dong Zhang, Wei Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin Hou *Department of Radiology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0449-6026
Ming Yong Gao *Department of Radiology, Research Institute for Translation Medicine on Molecular Function and Artificial Intelligence Imaging, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-1653
Ai Zhen PanDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute for Translation Medicine on Molecular Function and Artificial Intelligence Imaging, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China.
Qiu Dian WangCenter for Human Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2466-0030
Bin LiuDepartment of Interventional Medicine, The 2nd Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1686-1553
Ya Bin JinClinical Research Institute, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China.
Jia Bin LuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Qing Yuan HeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xiao Dong ZhangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1665-8187
Wei WangDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute for Translation Medicine on Molecular Function and Artificial Intelligence Imaging, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9720-8566
First People's Hospital of Foshan · CNPeking University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNShandong University · CNUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circle of Willis (CoW) is the most critical collateral pathway that supports the redistribution of blood supply in the brain. The variation of CoW is closely correlated with cerebral hemodynamic and cerebral vessel-related diseases. But what is responsible for CoW variation remains unclear. Moreover, the visual evaluation for CoW variation is highly time-consuming. In the present study, based on the computer tomography angiography (CTA) dataset from 255 patients, the correlation between the CoW variations with age, gender, and cerebral or cervical artery stenosis was investigated. A multitask convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to segment cerebral arteries automatically. The results showed the prevalence of variation of the anterior communicating artery (Aco) was higher in the normal senior group than in the normal young group and in females than in males. The changes in the prevalence of variations of individual segments were not demonstrated in the population with stenosis of the afferent and efferent arteries, so the critical factors for variation are related to genetic or physiological factors rather than pathological lesions. Using the multitask CNN model, complete cerebral and cervical arteries could be segmented and reconstructed in 120 seconds, and an average Dice coefficient of 78.2% was achieved. The segmentation accuracy for precommunicating part of anterior cerebral artery and posterior cerebral artery, the posterior communicating arteries, and Aco in CoW was 100%, 99.2%, 94%, and 69%, respectively. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be considered as an adjunct tool for detecting the CoW, particularly related to reducing workload and improving the accuracy of the visual evaluation. The study will serve as a basis for the following research to determine an individual's risk of stroke with the aid of AI.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisCircle of WillisAngiographyArtificial IntelligenceCerebrovascular CirculationComputed Tomography AngiographyComputersConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34754409
PMCPMC8572634
OpenAlexW3211122919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.