ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021
Analysis of the Reactivity of Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease at High Altitude.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Efficacy of Rosuvastatin, Amlodipine, and Aspirin in the Treatment of Hypertension with Coronary Heart Disease and Its Effect on Platelet Aggregation.Disease markers · 2022Trial
- Retracted: Analysis of the Reactivity of Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease at High Altitude.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
- Overlapping Stents-Assisted Coiling for Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm : LVIS Stent within Neuroform EZ Stent.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-21Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/5B24441323C3B1A67BB95B65D7E08B
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of dual-antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) at high altitude by using thrombelastogram (TEG) and to analyze the related biochemical factors affecting drug reactivity.
methodsTotally 118 CHD patients who admitted to the Qinghai People's Hospital from September 2019 to September 2020 were enrolled in the group. Those people have lived in Qinghai for a long time. Seven days after DAPT, venous blood was collected on an empty stomach in the early morning of the next day; blood routine, coagulation function, and biochemical items were tested. Thrombelastogram (TEG) was used to draw curves to calculate platelet, coagulation and fibrinolysis functions, and drug inhibition rate. Patients were divided into the aspirin resistance (AR) group, clopidogrel resistance (CR) group, dual-antiplatelet drug resistance (DAR) group, and drug-sensitive group according to different inhibition rates. The drug efficacy was analyzed, and the clinical data, biochemical indexes, and TEG parameters of each group were compared to identify the risk factors of drug resistance.
resultsThose 118 CHD patients at high altitude were incorporated into the study, ranging from 38 to 84 years of age, including 81 males (68.64%) and 37 females (31.36%). The platelet function and coagulation-fibrinolysis function were detected by TEG, and MA
conclusionAntiplatelet drugs aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are associated with increased age, elevated HbA1c and FBG, and diabetes. Therefore, it is necessary to take reasonable treatment measures based on the actual situation of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.